Mo ........................... whatever happened to: "I love flowerhorns...pan fried with a side of salsa"
Well, that's kind of ironic. Years ago I might have been the poster child for hybrid haters. Then I had an epiphany of sorts. Our club of course has had...HAD...a very firm stance on hybrids, excluding and avoiding them. However we had no problem including fancy angelfish, discus, and various line bred cichlids. Myself and several other vocal members thought this was talking out of both sides of our mouth. The point was not HOW the fish was made, but that it was created at all. If you are manipulating fish by selective line breeding then you are in fact "creating" a fish that is not close to the fish that is found in the wild. If we were taking a stance on preserving the pure cichlid species, then how could we say "OK" to the various lemon yellow discus, veiled angelfish and the like, but saying NO to crossed species? The end didn't justify the means. It was still "messed with" by human hand.
Long story short...we had a discussion that lasted literally a couple years. While I was chairman of the club we were able to pass a proposition that in essence said that the clubs that hosted shows held the right to include or exclude hybrid fish in their shows. This led to further discussion about how the various fish would be described. Another group discussion ensued resulting in guidelines that basically put hybrids alongside other man-manipulated species into an ornamental category.
Trust me when I say this is NOT a popular decision. Many...MANY of the people in the club feel it is wrong. But you would be surprised at the number who are in agreement. It really came down to an all or nothing vote. Either we accept one or get rid of all...and no one wanted to say good bye to fish that have long held a place in the club. The really difficult part HOW fish like these are judged in a show. Judging the fish comes down to how does it compare to the wild standard. Pretty difficult to compare a lime green discus to the wild phenotype. The trouble with Flowerhorns is even more of a challenge. There are NO standards for comparison. So....ornamental class and eye of the beholder.
This is one of those "bag of snakes" conversations that I could discuss for hours. My personal preference is to maintain fish that are as close to what we see in the wild. The various "ornamental" cichlids are intriguing "eye candy". Some, like the Thai Silk or Red Texas I would like to have because it's pretty and I would enjoy taking photos.
But given a limited number of tanks, would opt for what I have now. What I absolutely appreciate its that many hobbyists, especially younger hobbyists, enjoy and keep the fish in question. And I am ALL for encouraging people to enjoy the hobby. Where the club should...and will... play an integral role is in educating the masses about the beauty of the natural cichlids and working with preservation of cichlids both in the wild AND in the hobby.
SOOO in the words of the late Rodney King...can't we all just get along? LOL Seriously you are always going to have people on the left and right of an issue. I just chose to take a step closer to the center.
i say a jack dempsey runt:/
Seriously? This was answered on page one. The fish is H. bartoni.