U.S.F.W. proposes bill to prohibit all members of Python, Boa & Eunectes genera

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
N-E Cichlids;1484963; said:
Problem is people are buying these animals simply to say I have one. What the hell is anyone going to do with a full grown Anaconda.

LPS sells them too. And scary how many they sell as they don't sit on the shelves long. But it it's a highly educated pet store the kind that quizs the customer before selling the pet. I question the same thing but I also know a older guy locally who keeps several venomous snakes(too many to name) so there's always a few out of a bunch who should be able to keep such an animal.

People in general(especially those who are in a higher power) want to restrict things they don't understand. Shame that some ignorant/uneducated hobbiests have brought another kind of pet to need restrictions placed on it.
 
Here is my current letter, still subject to revision:
-----------------------------------------
I am writing in response to the proposed bill by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife to prohibit importation/ownership of all genera of Boa, Python and Eunectes.

I am deeply concerned with the impact that this bill will have on the community of people who keep and breed reptiles as a hobby. The vast majority of the species covered in the bill pose little threat to everyday life, certainly not more than owning a cat or a dog. I understand this bill is a response to the recent invasion of large python species infiltrating south Florida, but why not concentrate on the regulation of those select few species instead of outright banning all members of Boidae, most of which rarely exceed 5 feet long? After all, that is what the state of Florida has done already with the following species: Burmese python, African rock python, reticulated python, and green anacondas. The bill that the U.S.F.W. is proposing that is against all pythons and boas is the equivalent of banning the ownership of all dogs based on pitbulls used on dogfighting.

This bill, while good in its intentions, will end up devastating the lives of many hobbyists who keep those smaller species. I, for one, own a ball python, a commonly kept species that rarely even reaches a length of five feet and poses no greater threat to human life than a cocker spaniel. I have had this snake for nearly 15 years, longer than any other pet I've owned. I couldn't bear to give him up, but if this bill is passed, I fear I will be forced to do so.

I hope that the powers that be reconsider this bill and what it really means for the reptile industry.
----------------------

Any comments? feedback?
 
I might be tempted to drop the pitbull statement.... I wouldn't compare them at all. Make it clearer that their are areas where there are not snakes as invasive species, and so a US wide ban isn't the answer.
The economical effects as an industry should be mentioned too. Also they should take a look and list actual species that are a problem... not just any under a class that describes as many as it does. I'm getting pissed just thinking about this bill, and it's not even my country!
 
For someone trying to get a group to get the STATE to lift a ban, this drives me INSANE!!!
I am posting flyers with the link to this proposal and the address to write to voice concerns on my Upper Valley Reptile Group website and pet stores anywhere within driving distance from me.

here's a pic of the flyer I'm putting up.

ban!.jpg
 
Nice to see someone take some strides forward. I know it doesn't really matter, but as it's a flyer... you have a typo on their.
 
davo;1487476; said:
Nice to see someone take some strides forward. I know it doesn't really matter, but as it's a flyer... you have a typo on their.

Yeah, I just re-proofed it before printing. Was in a hurry.
I also plan to be at the New England Reptile Expo with my local herp group in April.
 
very nice kitty.. kudo's to you for taking stuff in your own hands and trying to get the word out.
 
davo;1487424; said:
I might be tempted to drop the pitbull statement.... I wouldn't compare them at all. Make it clearer that their are areas where there are not snakes as invasive species, and so a US wide ban isn't the answer.
The economical effects as an industry should be mentioned too. Also they should take a look and list actual species that are a problem... not just any under a class that describes as many as it does. I'm getting pissed just thinking about this bill, and it's not even my country!

I agree.. all good points and kudos to you as well Op for taking initative...
 
My husband and I discussed this a bit, he brought up another point. America's song birds have greatly declined due to domestic cats. Several species historically have disappeared due to the introduction of domestic cats and dogs. Yet there is no law or ban on people letting cats outside.

Here's one article that is about it. http://birding.about.com/od/conservation/a/migratoryday.htm
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com