flowerpower;3927687; said:I didn't post it so I can't answer that but, considering that they came in 2 separate e-mails, that may be the case. Ask Ira.
I'll say this again; "utterly ridiculous" speculation.
I am just saying you showed 2 methods, to prove your point, and I simply pointed out, using your demonstration to make the post appear as it did, it would have required both methods of posting. From a person that is not technically adept, using varying methods, to the same end is strange.
Correct? I am not asking if that is how it was done, neither of us were there. But that pretty much sums it up, right?
Looking how a post appears is not speculation, it is fact. How it technically was done, is not speculation.
I am trying to understand, you guys have lots of "speculation" everything I have said is fact. I am not giving you what ifs, that is what you are providing.
