People would argue all across the spectrum...
The way I see it is - For the overwhelming majority of fish, water exchange (the volume of water they are contained in at a given time, and its rate of exchange with surrounding water) is much, much higher than what we offer in tanks. More so for riverine species but even for many lacustrine species. In addition, natural communities have infinitely more extensive buffering systems that provide a much higher stability than typical aquaria.
Therefore, in my tanks, the 60-70% weekly water change I do is much, much less, so I should strive to accomplish it every week, and more if I can.
The general philosophies of striving to do the least water changes in tanks, and that of "seeing how few or small water change I can get away with" are bent.
The experiments of what one can do with closed systems and all of that are very nice, but that is only what is all about for very few fish keepers.
The way I see it is - For the overwhelming majority of fish, water exchange (the volume of water they are contained in at a given time, and its rate of exchange with surrounding water) is much, much higher than what we offer in tanks. More so for riverine species but even for many lacustrine species. In addition, natural communities have infinitely more extensive buffering systems that provide a much higher stability than typical aquaria.
Therefore, in my tanks, the 60-70% weekly water change I do is much, much less, so I should strive to accomplish it every week, and more if I can.
The general philosophies of striving to do the least water changes in tanks, and that of "seeing how few or small water change I can get away with" are bent.
The experiments of what one can do with closed systems and all of that are very nice, but that is only what is all about for very few fish keepers.