sherman;5141467; said:Hit the nail on the head.When people tell me you cant keep a O in a 55. I know it will fit. fifteen years ago I didnt hav the luxury of fish forums.So a 55 was a huge tank to me.Stuffed two Os in and did a w/c once a month.They lived for yrs in there.But it dosent mean it was right.Its a difference between fish living and just existing.![]()
muffywrx;5141239; said:Gee What would the fish do all day? Swim over a foot and a half and then be able to turn to swim over another foot and a half? Seems pretty cruel to me.
Not to mention if you spooked a full grown one? It would probably break the tank.
Aquanero;5141443; said:There is a big differance between a fish surviving in an environment and thriving in an enviornment. Yes, they are fish not submarines and should be treated as living creatures and provided with the best environmet and care possible, not shoehorned into a tank far too small, why would you put a fish that can grow to 16" in a tank 13" wide? At some point common sense needs to guide our decisions.
A 55 GALLON TANK IS NOT SUITABLE FOR AN OSCAR!
OP, Sorry for the derail but it had to be said.

shamrock;5144042; said:OMG!! Then keeping fish in a glass cage-what is that?
IMO:squege56;5137896; said:1. Oscar
2. Green Terror
3. Red Devil
4. Jaguar cichlid