creepyoldguy;4769113; said:If it really is the ac70, it will be fine. IF its the ac110 you'll be more than fine. Ac70 does 300gph. Thats a 10x turnover rate per hour. More than enough.
+1
creepyoldguy;4769113; said:If it really is the ac70, it will be fine. IF its the ac110 you'll be more than fine. Ac70 does 300gph. Thats a 10x turnover rate per hour. More than enough.
College fishman;4769182; said:right now, the stock is undecided. its not for my tank, im givving it to my friend to start him up in fish
he really wants a neon liek bright colored tank, so were not sure yet.
Does this filter need activated carbon??[/QUOTE]
Awesome!
This is somewhat debated on this forum. Myself, and I believe the majority of MFK, believes that carbon is not necessary in a healthy tank. It has its purpose for medicines and other toxins. In my experience, I feel that it is not necessary and takes up space in the filter that could be used for more biological media. I currently do not, and haven't for some time used carbon. I have pretty healthy fish and choose new stock as wisely as I can and have not had anything that couldn't be treated with higher temp and salt.
Last, but not least, that filter will be fine with a 30g tank full of neons.
College fishman;4769069; said:7" across the front of the filter, and 4 1/2" from front to back.
if its the 70, would yall say it would be ok for a 30gal?