How did you reach that conclusion based on my post? I don't think rarity has anything to do with whether or not a fish is a "better pet," but apparently you do, hence my post, but apparently rather than making some attempt to explain your position, you prefer to post an irrelevant statement and respond to my question with another question. Impressive debate skills you have there.rarity just means a higher price tag. so you're implying fish that are harder to keep are better pets?
