JD7.62;1898056; said:That is an ST, D. pulcher. D.microlepis was a valid name until 1998 as ST and ITs were both thought to be the same fish. D. pulcher was first described in 1998 as a separate species.
I see, thanks for the info
JD7.62;1898056; said:That is an ST, D. pulcher. D.microlepis was a valid name until 1998 as ST and ITs were both thought to be the same fish. D. pulcher was first described in 1998 as a separate species.
Panerai1950;1897782; said:Here is a pic of a Dat labled as an IT (Datonioides.microlepis) found on a Jap website with ST tail stripes.
yup, that's a it!!! tail is not the only id keyPanerai1950;1897782; said:Here is a pic of a Dat labled as an IT (Datonioides.microlepis) found on a Jap website with ST tail stripes.
Cheerss, started to get a better picture on id these guysflamenco-t;1898981; said:First big pic on page 1 is an IT. The tail is not the way to ID dats...I always look at the body proportion between height and length. There's no def formula, but I can tell almost 9 out of 10 at a time.
The first pic have a rectangular body shape, while ST usually have a short wide body rectangular shape.
Again, hard to explain, but if you see a lot of them, you can tell easily.
Now, the second small pic, I have to say it's an ST just by looking at the height of the body versus the length, but again at a juvi stage, anything is hard to ID accurately..
stan
Panerai1950;1899061; said:How about the dat below? it's found from other forum and said as a ST but with IT tail steipes...![]()

Panerai1950;1899061; said:How about the dat below? it's found from other forum and said as a ST but with IT tail steipes...![]()
jlnguyen74;1899140; said:Your dat is def a nice IT
Because some ST DOES have IT stripe on the tail, that's why we don't ID dat by just the tail stripes![]()
The whole package - body shape, stripe, color, tail stripePanerai1950;1899156; said:so what u personally use to id Dats?Thanks