XRAYZ;1689979; said:here is a pic of my polli and retro....
its not specifically these two that are mixed up or mislabeled, and it doesn't have to do with how closely they look or not, e.g. these two here really look nothing alike, aside from some similar markings.tropheus;1690941; said:in fact in this pic it is now clear to see its retro , the face markings are exactly the same as your retro and the polli seam to lack them ,allough i can now see why theese two are mixed up so much at the lfs
Infblue;1691728; said:it's quite a trend for a number of bichirs in retail. e.g. senegalus mislabeled as 'palmas', palmas polli mislabeled as 'retropinnis', lapradei mislabeled as 'congicus', just to name a few. When misID occurs, i think mostly thats because the retailers don't know bichirs well or at all, so they go with what the invoice says, which unfortunately is wrong.
