MyFishEatYourFish;4702883; said:
tattoed fish. if we keep buying them, china will continue to torture fish.
also, i think we should be able to have any fish that we desire. but i think people somehow need to be held liable for the care of the fish. for example, if you want a redtail cat you must sign saying you will provide it with a home for life. and maybe once a year your tank is inspected for conditions and if not met fines are made and rights revoked if need be. it shouldn't have to be this way, but as long as people consider fish such a low lifeform and lacking a soul, fish will be abused and not be given the respect they reserve. this would also deter impulse buys and make sure dedicated owners with a passion for the hobby are the only ones buying demanding fish.
sorry for the rant, but working at a couple of fish stores really formed a strong opinion about these kinds of things.
"also, i think we should be able to have any fish that we desire." - This I doubt will be something that will ever happen do to the irresponsibility of fishkeepers who tire of a certain fish and release them into the wild or dispose of them in other ways just to be rid of them.
"but i think people somehow need to be held liable for the care of the fish."
If you compare this statement, to the other species of animals who are and have been viciously and seriously abused, like cats, dogs, horses and others, you will see that they are in need of regulating too, but how many of these animals are done this way? None are, in the United States.
"for example, if you want a redtail cat you must sign saying you will provide it with a home for life. and maybe once a year your tank is inspected for conditions and if not met fines are made and rights revoked if need be."
Domesticatd dogs, cats, horses and etc. are brutally abused everyday. And for those who are irresponsible animal owners, abuse and torture these animals by whatever means, and are the most who go unpunished. Very few are prosecuted and go to jail, do community service for extended periods of time or at all, or are heavily fined. So far to my knowledge, anyone who has been found guilty, has never been denied the priveledge, of animal ownership even for a short period of time, 6 months to 5 years. It should be a denied priveledge, of any animal ownership for 25 years to life. And it's truly sad, because an animal can not speak up for itself. Who comes to an animal owners property or house to do a health and welfare check-up on dogs, cats or horses. It only happens if you call a vetrinarian for livestock farm animals. All others are taken in to a hospital or clinic by "responsible animal owners". Animal abuser's do not care. So because of the lack of monetary resources, manpower, jail space, court availability . . . rights being revoked will become a faerie tail, a rumor, a myth and will definitely be non-exhistant.