Whats your take on hybrids?
- Thread starter Passionate 4 pikes
- Start date
Passionate 4 pikes;1958144; said:wow some people can make some things sound so stupid when there not stupid at all. sheesh
yourself
wasnt directed towards you, but now i see that you ARE one of those people. relax man. dont get upset at people that dont agree with you. youll be mad all the time
headbanger_jib;1959147; said:
No never, i do lve in brazil you know
jcardona1;1959363; said:
that was pitifulI voted: I don't care.
Who am I to tell others what kind of fish that they should like or not like.
If I were someone who likes big, mean cichlids, then flowerhorns offer more of what you like: more color, more aggression, bigger head, etc.
That's why I assume that they were created in the first place.
Who am I to tell others what kind of fish that they should like or not like.
If I were someone who likes big, mean cichlids, then flowerhorns offer more of what you like: more color, more aggression, bigger head, etc.
That's why I assume that they were created in the first place.
The thing I have against hybrids is stuff like: If you want to get a trimac, you'll almost always end up with low grade fh's. Basically they are bad for the gene pool if you want a pure fish. Some people don't label hybrids as hybrids, such as the rd/midas. Peeps try to pass off low grade fh as trimacs, etc etc. If any of my fish hybridize, I feed the fry to my other fish.
I can understand people liking flowerhorns though, I just don't like the fact that hybrids often end up making the fish that are available in the hobby, unpure.
I can understand people liking flowerhorns though, I just don't like the fact that hybrids often end up making the fish that are available in the hobby, unpure.
