which cryptid could exist?
- Thread starter Akuma
- Start date
You know why I know the lockness monster is BS? Cause a few piranha, a few snake head, or a few cichlids released into a certain lake can devastate that ecosystem. Now, we are talking about a huge water animal, I would bet that animal would cause more damage than any piranha, snakehead, cichlid etc, can ever do. And we are talking about only one of them, imagine a group of them? If there is a group out there it would have destroyed that ecosystem already and people would see them a lot more often. People have investigated that lake and found NOTHING. Most of these cryptids are fiction.
Sorry, but a single footprint will never be enough to prove Bigfoot exists. Until they find a real actual body that real scientists can analyze, everything else is BS and a waste of time.
actually, the loch ness monster is said to have lived there for thousands of years. Its not as if it was just introduced. I believe that there would plenty of time for the ecosystem to evolve around it. Plus the lake is filled with a ton of connecting caves at the bottom, making sonar scanning alot harder.
Not saying I believe in it (I don't), just want to show the other side of the coin.
Bigfoot ofcoursefound this while fishing a few weeks ago, def. Kept looking over my shoulder afterwards. I was a good 1-2 miles away from anywhere a human would go without shoes.
View attachment 918689View attachment 918690
P.s. no this is not my foot i was wearing boots and there were no other tracks around, a few partials and a clear trail through the water about 3 ft. Out like something was trying to hide them lol
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using MonsterAquariaNetwork App
Actually the upper photo you can see bird foot prints. Compared to the bird looks like regular human foot prints.
You know, back in medieval times they made up a lot of stories about monsters eating people in the water. Those stories probably evolved to what is now the Lockness monster. Just cause it was made up 1000s of years ago doesn't mean it is true. They said a lot of things 100os of years ago to scare people, but now that there are smarter people and actual science to investigate we now know a lot of these "stories" are a big fat pile of steaming crap.
PS they have the technology now to have cameras on 24/7 and record activity in a area. Wonder why there is no actual proof these animals exist? Humans have made up a lot of lies in the past but they never thought one day that humans would have the tools to investigate. Many lies told have been proven to be BS.
Its also telling that we can always seem to find concrete evidence of just about any animal, no matter how hard it is to track down, except for the ones that are based in lore from 100s if not 1000s of years ago. If bigfoot exists, why cant we find 1 legit pic of it, same for loch ness monster? And I dont buy that they are rare, since we can still find evidence of endangered animals in equally vast areas.
