K Kyel Feeder Fish MFK Member Dec 24, 2010 387 1 0 Brighton,Colorado Aug 13, 2011 #1 I am new to canister filters and wanted to know which is better the FX5 or the Filstar XP4.
K Kyel Feeder Fish MFK Member Dec 24, 2010 387 1 0 Brighton,Colorado Aug 13, 2011 #3 Okay Thanks. I was trying to decide between the two
Pharaoh Administrator Staff member Administrator MFK Member Feb 18, 2008 17,567 178 1,097 Indianapolis Aug 13, 2011 #4 FX5, hands down.
J Jc1119 Feeder Fish MFK Member Dec 27, 2010 4,432 19 0 Orlando fl Aug 13, 2011 #5 ^^^ true.... I have several renas and like them alot, but for a little more money I think the fx5 wins. I do think the Rena is easier to perform maintenance on, but the fluval wins every other category IMO
^^^ true.... I have several renas and like them alot, but for a little more money I think the fx5 wins. I do think the Rena is easier to perform maintenance on, but the fluval wins every other category IMO
K Kyel Feeder Fish MFK Member Dec 24, 2010 387 1 0 Brighton,Colorado Aug 13, 2011 #6 Thanks for the input
A aclockworkorange Dovii MFK Member Jun 24, 2010 9,585 46 105 39 Rose City Aug 14, 2011 #7 FX5 for sure. This is coming from someone who owns an FX5 and an XP3.
C crisper Feeder Fish MFK Member Jan 4, 2008 2,286 1 0 over there boi Aug 14, 2011 #8 fx5 holds a lot more media and moves a lot more water.
S skillzizzo Plecostomus MFK Member Feb 18, 2007 908 36 61 45 Mesa - Arizona Aug 14, 2011 #9 All around fx5 hands down. Dont need to prime fx5 ever, it holds more media, has a higher flow rate, has quick valve disconnect shut offs.
All around fx5 hands down. Dont need to prime fx5 ever, it holds more media, has a higher flow rate, has quick valve disconnect shut offs.
Z z400 Jack Dempsey MFK Member Mar 2, 2010 194 0 31 Illinois Aug 14, 2011 #10 I can only comment on the rena's. i currently have 3 XP4's up and running, i love all 3 of them.