which would you rather?

[rodger]

All three!!

 

[Gill Blue]

2 265 both are large enough for big fish and 2 species/ecosystems

2 265s, Id rather have 2 completely different setups than deal with the headache of only 1 tank and being limited in what I keep

I think it's funny, their reasons for wanting the two smaller tanks are the same as mine for wanting the bigger one. my 245G won't hold the bigger fish I'd like, and one tank is twice as easy to care for as two.

 

[lp85253]

2 265 both are large enough for big fish and 2 species/ecosystems

+ more stuff to mess with...(filters)...

 

[administrator]

Personally (1) 500 but I bet you can get (2) 265 cheaper than the 500 from CL.

 

[Squirtle919]

+1 for the fish that I keep it would make more sense. I guess it really just depends on what fish you plan to keep.

Sent from my Amazon Kindle Fire using MonsterAquariaNetwork App

Agreed there needs to be an option for all 3

 

[Squirtle919]

I think it's funny, their reasons for wanting the two smaller tanks are the same as mine for wanting the bigger one. my 245G won't hold the bigger fish I'd like, and one tank is twice as easy to care for as two.

Not always. You could link the 2 tanks to the one sump. ruffly the same surface area to clean also. I think it would be more for people keeping large aggressive fish.

 

[Mayo]

all 3 for me if i could, otherwise id take the single big one!

 

[PDRed302]

one tank is twice as easy to care for as two.

Bingo...

1X 500g for me

 

[Redtail Monster]

500 for sure... then start saving for the second 500....

 

[administrator]

500 for sure... then start saving for the second 500....