tcarswell;2915309; said:Hey Ewurm you inspired yet![]()
Ouch! He's one fire.....not being literal here. hehe
tcarswell;2915309; said:Hey Ewurm you inspired yet![]()
Changed.tcarswell;2913601; said:WHOOOPS I accidentally put why is clout not illegal /not available I meant to say why is clout ILLEGAL/Not available in California
Answered by this.beblondie;2912486; said:Clout
MFG by:
Aquarium Products
treats:
hydra, leeches, planaria, hexamita, epistylis, trichodina, tetrahymena, body fungus, argulus (louse), flukes, parasitic copepods, and lernia (anchor worms)
ingredients
4-[p-(dimethylamino)-0-phenylbenzylidene]-2, 5-cyclohexadien-1-xylidenedimethylammonium chloride,
dimethyl (2, 2, 2-trichloro-1-hydroxy-ethel) phosphonate,
2-methyl-5-nitro-1-hydroxyethylmidazole
something in there is a know carcenogenic according to CA
Proprietary: NO
Ingredients: METRONIDAZOLE, FLAGYL, IMIDAZOLE-1-ETHANOL,2-METHYL-5-
NITRO
Ingredient Number: 03
CAS Number: 443-48-1
ACGIH (RTECS) Number: NI5600000
TLV Number: NONE
ACGIH Number: NONE
OSHA PEL Number: NONE
TWA: NONE
Ingredient Number: 03
Route Of Entry - Inhalation: YES
Route Of Entry - Skin: YES
Route Of Entry – Ingestion: YES
Health Hazard Acute And Chronic: SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS: MAY CAUSE IRRITATION
TO EYES AND OPEN SORES.
Carcinogenicity - NTP: NO
Carcinogenicity - IARC: NO
Carcinogenicity – OSHA: NO
Explanation Carcinogencity: CALIFORNIA PROPOSITION 65.
LD50:
ORL-RAT LD50: 3GM / KG.
ORL-MUS LD50: 3800 MG / KG.
IPR- MUS LD50: 870 MG / KG.
SCU-MUS LD50: 3640 MG / KG.
What is California Proposition 65?
Proposition 65 is a California law that has been in effect since 1986 to promote clean drinking water and keep toxic substances that cause cancer and birth defects out of consumer products. Proposition 65's formal title is "The Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986." It is administered by Cal/EPA's Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA).
Proposition 65 regulates substances listed by California as causing cancer or birth defects or other reproductive harm in two ways. The first regulatory arm of Proposition 65 prohibits businesses from knowingly discharging listed substances into drinking water sources, or onto land where the substances can pass into drinking water sources. The second regulatory arm of Proposition 65 prohibits businesses from knowingly exposing individuals to listed substances without providing a clear and reasonable warning.
Since enactment, Proposition 65 has been the reason for the addition of notices of specific contents to consumer product labels. Along with the added label requirements, an official list of implicated substances is maintained and made publicly available. Entries are added or removed based on current scientific information. All substances listed show their known or suspected risk factors, a unique CAS chemical classification number, the date they were listed, and if so, whether they have been delisted.
This topic is about the legality issue of the Clout, not the other states behind the EPA laws.Finalfire9;2922082; said:Can we get back to the fact that all other states then cali are usally 10-20 years behind in EPA laws codes and trends
It statistically has no damaging effect on lungs. Safer than aspirin has no effect on heart at all. May even help prevent cancer.MoFish78;2922051; said:I could see how marijuana/medical marijuana dispensaries are sometimes necessary for medical use. The only problem is, people abuse it too. I think it will be scary to see it being legalized since it also has many negative effects on our brains, lungs, heart etc.
It impairs our thinking and destroys our brain cells, just to name a few. Imagine if all of us were high on pot? LOL who's gona take the lead? LOL
There are also many other ways to relieve different kinds of pain aside from smoking pot. It just bothers me when I get a patient who admits to smoking everyday to relieve such things as headaches? Anxiety?
lol this thread is going in more directions than an autocross course. Sorry lupinsrikamaraja;2923453; said:+1, also no effect on Brain tissues except for preventing/shrinking tumors.
BACK ON TRACK! Given the recent studies showing the amount of caffeine, birth control, and recreational drugs in our waterways, can we really blame California for trying to keep a compound toxic to humans out of watersheds?
In some areas, spontaneous sex changes occur in frogs and fish due to the amount of hormones we take to regulate our bodies... And not all American sewage treatment is up to par, definitely not enough to remove harmful compounds, only the bacteria that manufacture them.
It's only a matter of time before groundwater supplies become highly contaminated, thank god I live in the Northeastern U.S., where (cold)water is FREE!