Blood Worms every once in a while actually benefit your fish.
Really, how so?
I would also love to know exactly what nutrients are found in foods such as blood worms, crickets, fish eggs, etc, that can't be found in a quality pellet food?
A common mistake made by many hobbyists who chant the "variety" mantra. It's not all about the ingredient list, it's what nutrients those ingredients add to the formula, and their bioavailability. As in amino acids, fatty acids, carbs, vitamins, minerals, etc.
Variety is not a nutrient.
This is just a hobby for most people, a way to relax, get in touch with nature, whatever. People can feed their fish Russian caviar if that's what floats their boat. The reality is that there has been very little research performed on the actual nutrient requirements of most of the tropical fish kept in this hobby, so all that most of us are doing (myself included) is taking an educated guess when it comes to providing nutrition to our fish.
But an educated guess doesn't equate to simply taking a wild guess based on nothing more than a personal feeling.
As an example, crickets do not have a proper calcium/phosphorous ratio. This is exactly why when feeding herps many insects (including crickets) require calcium supplementation prior to feeding. For some people in the fish hobby who live in an area with sufficient calcium in their tap water this won't present an issue as if required most tropical fish can uptake calcium from the water, but in an area where the tap water is low in calcium, or completely void, if too many crickets are being fed to the fish over time this could lead to a number of different health related issues. It could potentially affect growth rates, create bone/scale/skeletal disorders, etc.
So yes, I agree with Forrest, pellets are an all in one food that take care of any deficiencies found in the wild.
Are they a perfect food designed by the fish gods themselves? NO. Is this a perfect science? NO.
But it is a science, and one where countless millions of $$$ have been spent over the past 100 years. If one can view that science with an open unbiased mind, and is capable of thinking outside the box along the way, it is most definitely possible to feed a fish in captivity, better than most would ever eat in the wild.