Somethingfishyinc.net;4685852; said:I do not agree. I do not know or have looked that much into it but only what I have seen on the news. Reason I do no agree because its not good all around for safety reasons for us, allies & our soldiers. And yes I'm not a big fan of the government & how they handle some things or what they do but when there are many that have not been involved in maybe questionable things are at risk for others mistakes it should not be for the world to see & should be handled here at home.
my 2 cents.
Warborg;4685857; said:I haven't decided yet, I've seen good and bad from them. They shouldn't expose stuff about the wars as it could endanger lives but the other secrets about the government and banks...etc. is fair game.
soulpatch;4685944; said:WL got the same data and worked with news agencies in the Iraq files and such. Not this time around. Not only that but they are posting data stolen from the govt and if you or I did that here in the US we woudl see the inside of a small cell quickly.
All this does is put the US in a very bad position with allies, enemies, and impartial countries. A lot of the data is pretty comon knowledge BUT there is also a lot of data that does not show the other context and previous conversations and such. For example the Yemen files not showing discussions with other assets and such well in advance of the strike.
We have a govt that for better or worse is expected to be the defender of the free world. We are the ones other countries turn to to do dirty work since we have assets. Though we also have to be sure what the rest of the world is doing as well so we do not overstep or take one country's word as the end all.
Releasing these files will not stop any of this from happening. All it does is undermine operations or policies that are in place and piss off even more people around the world with the US when in most instances THEIR govts are doing the same or worse things. Can you imagine if there were a wikileaks for Iran, Russia, China, Israel, Venezeula, ect.???
Miguel;4686073; said:That guy is a top notch terrorist. There is no way around that.
I pray that no bad comes out of this.
Chaitika;4686124; said:The private who gave the stolen information to WL faces a maximum 52 years of incarceration if he is tried in a criminal court. I doubt very much that the private will live to see any courtroom or court martial. Same with the douche Assange. It is obvious that both the private and WL want to torment the US, insisting the US is exploiting third world countries. They have both said it for the record. One file they released shows all the soft (non-protected)global locations that the US is interested in, including Canada. Bridges, border crossings, companies, freeways, mine shafts, towns, airports, all sorts of locations where the US' intent is not clear. Thanks for giving al-quaeda all sorts of new intel.
Anyone who possesses that info is in possession of stolen goods, and breaking the law.
It is that simple.
soulpatch;4686285; said:Because you do not know of everything with the govt does not make it repressive.
And relating the screening of WL to what China does is retarded. We are not blocking people from seeing public information that everyone knows. They would be trying to protect their own internal and sensitive data. If you feel everything shoudl be open to the world then I guess you should be posting your SS #, bank accounts, email, passwords, ect. Both the govt and an individual share rights to have data be withheld.
I agree with all this. One thing I can't understand from some people is how they are so anti govt. It's like they have this paranoia. So they think things like wikileaks is good. Only something bad can come out of it IMO.
