cchhcc;2903581; said:WHERE ARE THE PICS OF THE FREAKING 30" DOVII!!!!!!!
: - )
fobrinkle;2903682; said:He was talking about an emperor not a Dovii.

It's debatable about which is the largest, but I do believe largest=heaviest=most massive, we don't consider giraffes to be the largest land animals because they are the tallestdarth pike;2902833; said:This reminds me of the arguement about the world's 'largest' snake ...
The longer retic python or the heavier anaconda ...
Do we go with the longer Emperor, the heavier Tem or do we figure out some complex mathmatical formula to give both length and weight equal parameters and thus can compare?
Or concede it's a silly arguement, drop 'largest' from the vocabulary, and either use 'longest' or 'heaviest' ...
Largest will always equal heaviest. Is the largest fish a 15 foot long, 400 pound arapaima? No, it is a 600 pound, 9 foot long mekong catfish.cichlidinsomniac;2904580; said:It's debatable about which is the largest, but I do believe largest=heaviest=most massive, we don't consider giraffes to be the largest land animals because they are the tallest
that's what i said, but by debatable i meant which species is larger the emp or the temI<3fish;2905592; said:Largest will always equal heaviest. Is the largest fish a 15 foot long, 400 pound arapaima? No, it is a 600 pound, 9 foot long mekong catfish.
i read on cichlidae that an emp can reach 1.3meters so that would weigh more than a temI<3fish;2905747; said:Well larger, of course the tem will be much heavier. But length wise is debatable as I have never seen an emperor in a pic larger than 32" although some sites say 40"...