Citrinellus;4410457; said:Yeah I was lost on that comment too...
what's with the all caps thing?
Citrinellus;4410457; said:Yeah I was lost on that comment too...
cichlid2006;4410466; said:it is a jag, some places still classify them under Cichlasoma. My lfs' wholesaler list has dovii and jaguars listed under Cichlasoma instead of Parachromis.
cichlid2006;4410466; said:it is a jag, some places still classify them under Cichlasoma. My lfs' wholesaler list has dovii and jaguars listed under Cichlasoma instead of Parachromis.
kevinfleming21;4410434; said:I think you saw this: (16) Jaguar guapote, Cichlidae Family (Cichlasoma managuense).
This is on the restricted species list, but this is not a Jag cichlid. They are not illegal.
VRWC;4410477; said:yea, thats a Jag. They are classified different in different states for some reason.
VRWC;4410491; said:man you guys post fast.
Thats a good question. I dont have a clue. I think in the end, the feds would triumph.
kevinfleming21;4410476; said:but then this question arises, if you classify it under Parachromis, not Cichlasoma, are would they then NOT be illegal?
greenterra;4410649; said:I doubt the scientific reclassification of the fish would give you a leg to stand on. Both names are representative of the same fish and a fact that would be easily proven in court.
THETETRAKING;4410426; said:YOU WILL MORE THEN YOU TO SEND THE FEDS A LETTER ABOUT TO MAKE THEM LEGAL