I believe anarekis' post about the english language was the fact he asked you a simple question and your answer had nothing to do with the question he had asked, i could be wrong but that is what it seems.
Now you claim that you are a paleogenticist so you should therefore know that when you make assumptions, or a hypothesis, that you should be supplying some sort of evidence that supports your hypothesis. You also made a claim that when someone wants to know biology that they go to you, as you are a paleogenticist, that is a pretty big call to make considering that paleogentics would seem to be a pretty specialised field in the discipline of gentics let alone the overall study of biology, and yes I would call applying genetics to paleontology a specialised field. Expecting us to take your word on the biology of a marine creature is akin to asking a Ornithologist about the biology of a rabbit sure they are going to know the basics but aren't the best to get the information from.
You may forgive me. But i don´t get paid here to examine a study, so i will say what i know and thats it.
