I am looking at it subjectively and I understand that getting out of your vehicle and even acting outside the normal boundaries of a neighborhood watchmen have no bearing on the outcome of this case, legally anyhow.
In the state of Florida it is not what lead up to the violence, it is who STARTED the violence. Its this simple, if Zimmerman started the violence he is guilty. If Martin started the violence then Zimmerman is innocent. What is so hard to understand about that? Do you really think that even if Martin sucker punched Zimmerman out of no where because he was following him that Zimmerman has no right to self defense?
In the state of Florida it is not what lead up to the violence, it is who STARTED the violence. Its this simple, if Zimmerman started the violence he is guilty. If Martin started the violence then Zimmerman is innocent. What is so hard to understand about that? Do you really think that even if Martin sucker punched Zimmerman out of no where because he was following him that Zimmerman has no right to self defense?