Maybe, or be slaughtered in the streets. Remember what I said about revolution and its real meaning
And what does that achieve? You will replace one group of people with another group that will do the same thing.
what 'revolution' means in Chinese( mandarin or cantonese? 革命,
Gémìng) , or at least as you have described it, does not seem to be the same as it means in English, or Russian, or French or Spanish or or or......... (A revolution (from the Latin 'revolutio', "a turn around") is a fundamental change in power or organizational structures that takes place in a relatively short period of time)
A nice deflection but what I said is still true. How are you going to equalize wealth without a large central power?
Just a dose of reality for people who have forgotten what real revolution is. I dare say Chinese literal meaning is quite accurate. See Egypt, Libya, Syria, etc for example...
Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
Just a dose of reality for people who have forgotten what real revolution is. I dare say Chinese literal meaning is quite accurate. See Egypt, Libya, Syria, etc for example...
Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
My take(s):
Distribution of wealth goes against human nature. Of course people want what others have and frequently feel (possibly justifiably) that they need it more or would spend it more wisely. The fact that they either didn't have the opportunity or take advantage of them doesn't phase those who want. There will always be the haves and the have-nots, but the "give me that" people are seldom willing to use force when they have the majority and think they can use "democracy" to take from others. Conversely the wealthier minority is always willing to use force to protect what is theirs. Survival of the fittest dictates those willing to use force will always overcome those who can't or won't.
Like Ben Franklin said: "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." Liberty will win..
Or Margaret Thatcher - "The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money. "
As for death penalty, it's a non issue for the most part. It could work if utilized properly, but it isn't and costs way more to have a death penalty than not. Either have a system and use it A LOT and be willing and diligent to do the best possible to prevent wrongful people, but also be willing to accept that mistakes will happen. OORRRRR just don't have a death penalty. Either would be fine, but our current system is somewhere in between so it doesn't work.