eat a good diet? see the doc for persistent fever? and drink ovoltine and you well be fine? or? spreading fear mongering bullcrap still makes it bullcrap. as is drinking Ovoltine, that stuff is nasty, any one seen my space suit? we aint in the 3rd world, we have good diets, good basic hygiene and state of thr art hospitals, you thinking this an issue for us need to be more worried about hepatitis, strain resistant TB, necrophilia bacteria, strain resistant infections in general. and last but not least? take your eyes off the smart phone and pay attention.
Hello; I find that your post rambles somewhat and is difficult to decipher. The best I can make out is that you feel we (In the USA) are somehow less likely to have a virus such as ebola become a public health problem once it gets out into the general population. I disagree with this assumption based on my education and personal observations made mainly in public schools.
I do have a biology degree and did teach AP biology aimed at potential med students. I had to keep up with some aspects of viral disease. We seem to have as much trouble with the other virus strains that are out in the states as does any other country. Once out into the general population I fear we will have issues even if not at the same level as Africa.
The basic hygene you mention is not so good in my experience and observation. I fear that few have a sound grasp of the steps necessary to prevent the spread of even a non-airborne virus like ebola. I recently had a discussion with an friend about sharing a water bottle. He seemed to be under the impression that because he knew a fellow and considered him clean that he knew the fellow could not have a disease. Even as I have conducted classes on disease and hygene, many students would share drinks and other stuff during flu and other outbreaks.
The advantage for those who actually have a good diet may be that they are in better condition and thus have more strength to survive the ebola virus. I do not see how a good diet can prevent a person from becoming infected if exposed.
The treatment facilities are much better in many areas in the USA. There are some areas with a small ratio of hospitals for the population. Even the hospitals that exist tend to have relatively small volume of total isolation units. We here can adapt to create more isolation units but I do not wish to speculate about how quickly this can be done if a large number become infected.
The last portion of your post seems at odds with itself. That we have state of the art hospitals and yet have the truly serious disease issues you list. Look up the the issue of hospital acquired infections.
I understand that it would be comforting to feel that folks living in developed countries do not have any thing to be worried about concerning ebola. The best thing will be that the virus never gets out into the general population. Once it does get out, then quarintine and tracking down all contacts of an infected person might keep it contained. I still contend that it would have been a better practice to keep all known infercted individuals out of the country.
There was a 30 minute documentary aired on PBS's Frontline tonight. It showed some of the protocals the medical personel are using in Africa.