Yep.Yeah and pledged allegiance to isis during the spree....
Interesting how these facts are conveniently left out....And screamed allah akbar, and his wifes history and also what she wrote on i think facebook before the attack.
Yep.Yeah and pledged allegiance to isis during the spree....
Interesting how these facts are conveniently left out....And screamed allah akbar, and his wifes history and also what she wrote on i think facebook before the attack.
Not quite sure whether they're facts or spews from media circuitInteresting how these facts are conveniently left out....
Not quite sure whether they're facts or spews from media circuit
None of us was there when it happened of course,but in light of previous similar events I think I will go with the newsmedia's accounts on this oneNot quite sure whether they're facts or spews from media circuit
MaddMaxx No court is going to make Apple create something that will damage their business. No Court and several legal minds have already stated that. Especially after any court that can look pass the fact that 2 Muslims are involved and not be bias because of it. The court if they follow the law and consider the facts that the FBI was totally negligent in how they handled the phone in the first place. But Again I don't think any court can make any company create something that will destroy a company. The iPhone is a big part of Apple. Also Tim Cook has also said there is no way that program would only work for that 1 phone.
This is true smitty, Apple would have to agree to do so, no court going to be able to make them.
it is one phone.. apple should just do it for this one phone but not disclose how...... the FBI does need to know as much as it can to prevent another slaughter of people....makes me cringe when i remember how the people who were slain were the same people who gave them gifts for their shower.. i think it was baby shower..or maybe wedding... how evil
i don't know...... but i do know that apple should have followed the judges orders just like anyone of us would have to do.... my opinion... and by the time they do unlock this phone i doubt it will be as much help to the FBI especially after so much public knowledge..So while I think we disagree fundamentallyRed Devil I overwhelmingly agree that there are plenty of "other ways" that Apple could help the FBI get information off of the phone in question. The PROBLEM is, the FBI didn't ask for any of those other ways. They asked, very specifically, for Apple to create a UNIVERSAL KEY that could be used to unlock the phone in question (and oh-by-the-way we admittedly have a ton of other unrelated phones that we want to use this UNIVERSAL KEY for).
...so this begs the question: Why didn't (and still not) the FBI ask for a different kind of help; if their true motivation is access to "just one phone"?
If everybody believes so, then there would not be an appeal process in the legal system, Lizbut i do know that apple should have followed the judges orders just like anyone of us would have to do.... my opinion...