I remember reading a study on a species of trout. The fish were kept at different temperatures to see how the fish copped.
The trout that were kept in the highest temps were short lived compared to those that were kept cold.
Then some of the trout were kept too warm for a period of time and then put back in colder water. These fish were able to live as long as the trout kept in the cooler temperatures .
The conclusion was that the fish could tolerate warm temperatures providing they had this "recovery" period.
My point here is,fish kept in permanent summer climes are more likely to suffer long term than those kept at the cooler end. I don't mean as cold as the fish can tolerate,just towards the lower end of their preferred range.No need for "recovery" time,unlike constant high temps.
Unless we are prepared to keep adjusting temps,higher temps will effect our fishes life span/quality.
So while I agree, nature is a varied and complex thing,keeping them a little cooler may be our best response?
I'm not preaching here and I wont pretend to be an expert on this subject. My opening post was a question not an instruction. I have been looking into this more and more of late and have nothing to offer of any major revelation or controversy. I just believe most of us (not all) are keeping our fish warmer than is necessary or beneficial.