Effects of feeding too much on tank water quality

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
For immediate conversion to nitrates yes, nitrates climbing faster within a certain period of time. But taking vacation for 1 week has shown me that 1 feeding in 7 days (feed the day I leave) still produces less nitrates than 3 feeding per week. With the 1 week vacation, my nitrates stay easily below 20ppm. With 3 feedings per week, my nitrates are easily above 20ppm.
Agreed. Ive seen the same whenon vacation of did a week long fast
 
The thing I notice with fish, is because in nature food is not always abundant, fish don't have a shut off valve telling them to stop eating. They will continuously eat until the source is gone, and in nature this serves them well.
In captivity however, this instinct doesn't go away, so if excess food is presented, fish will eat constantly whether it is good for them or not.
And in the same mode, even vegetarian species when confronted with a protein source (whether a glut of only protein is good for them or not) will gorge on it. I'm not saying the protein itself is bad, but in nature the fishes digestive system has evolved to balance it out with algae, detritus, and leaf litter that help work that protein efficiently thru the tract.

A good portion of cichlids are not strict carnivores so this concept applies, and especially to vegetarians and frugivorous types like Vieja, Cinelichthys, Etroplus and Anabantoids like true gouramis.

Predatores like Parachromis, or Petenia seldom catch meals every day, so have evolved to live under those conditions where only eat every 2 or 3 days.
So power feeding is often not a good idea, and if you do power feed to get that oscar, dovii or jag big fast, should realize with each growth spurt it will need more water changes, and soon a much larger tank.
And as far as leaving food lie around the tank for any length of time, this seems ridiculous to me,
I am reminded of the dead oscar thread, where pieces of shrimp were said to sit in the tank for days, pieces of shrimp exude ammonia, and do fish fillets, and are great media to grow pathogens, a good thing? I doubt it.
When in the states, i vacuumed quite often, here in Panama I've yet to vac my 18-, but its because I have way more plants, than fish, in the form of aquatic plants, terrestrial growing on the surface, and one of my sumps is an algae scrubber. That said, I still do substantial daily water changes, and only feed at most once per day.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Matteus and PYRU
Mhh not busy enough to quote it though.... lol will do

FYI - I quoted that at home, and answered you from work. . I'm on break now, so I have time to post again, for a few. Seeing as you are keeping track. At least now you know how to search using key words. lol



I believe the main thing about probiotics is the competition of neutral vs pathogenic bacteria, not so much nitrate removal since that is an anaerobic process and requires a whole other discussion entirely.

Food that's higher in quality will generally have better nutritional value and more food which can be digested, resulting in less waste being expelled.

Probiotics are utilized in commercial aquaculture for competitive exclusion, but they are also utilized to improve digestion, which results in reduced waste. This is the main selling point of Hikari's "germ". http://koihacienda.com/en/saki-hikari/

But yes, higher quality foods typically result in higher total digestibility, which results in less waste.
 
Most wild fish live by feast or famine, hence during the rainy season when food is abundant they feast, produce eggs, and spawn. During more famine periods, they require less nutrients, as they tend to expend less energy. In many aquariums the feast never ends .....
 
Probiotics are utilized in commercial aquaculture for competitive exclusion, but they are also utilized to improve digestion, which results in reduced waste. This is the main selling point of Hikari's "germ". http://koihacienda.com/en/saki-hikari/

But yes, higher quality foods typically result in higher total digestibility, which results in less waste.

+1 -- esp. with my Flowerhorn I have a possibly strange habit of changing his pellets every meal, every day (rotating between several brands/products, some of which incl. probiotics and some which don't). I do this for his (assumed) eating pleasure but also because none of the pellets I have easy access to fully meets the dietary/nutritional requirements on want him to have.

In any case it's quite easy for me to compare waste production (in my bare bottom tanks) after each feeding, and without doubt there is noticeably less waste produced after he's eaten the pellets with probiotics. That said, while I'm not sure about the science behind it, I've always had the hunch that feeding only probiotic pellets might not be so great for a fish, hence the inclusion of some non-probiotic pellets as well. If this 'balanced' approach isn't so great I'm happy to be advised otherwise.
 
+1 -- esp. with my Flowerhorn I have a possibly strange habit of changing his pellets every meal, every day (rotating between several brands/products, some of which incl. probiotics and some which don't). I do this for his (assumed) eating pleasure but also because none of the pellets I have easy access to fully meets the dietary/nutritional requirements on want him to have.

In any case it's quite easy for me to compare waste production (in my bare bottom tanks) after each feeding, and without doubt there is noticeably less waste produced after he's eaten the pellets with probiotics. That said, while I'm not sure about the science behind it, I've always had the hunch that feeding only probiotic pellets might not be so great for a fish, hence the inclusion of some non-probiotic pellets as well. If this 'balanced' approach isn't so great I'm happy to be advised otherwise.

what's the ingredient difference between the probiotic and non-probiotic pellets that you give your fish?
 
K krichardson


Mid-day friendo !
 
what's the ingredient difference between the probiotic and non-probiotic pellets that you give your fish?

Well again I'm talking about several pellets (mostly from Hikari and Ocean Nutrition), but for easy comparison let's take 2 from Hikari: Cichlid Gold (on left below) and BioGold+. There are a few differences but I think (and anybody correct me if I'm wrong) the probiotics in BioGold+ are coming from the "dried Bacillus subtilis fermentation product", which is also listed on their BloodParrot+ ingredients.

1370405

As a side note nobody will find me defending Hikari's over use of terrestrial-based fillers :(
 
Hey Barrett, from the sticky on probiotics.


Does it work? Well, according to the more positive studies, yes & no.

http://munin.uit.no/bitstream/handle/10037/3888/article.pdf?sequence=1


While it does improve the overall feed conversion ratio (FCR) the food used in that study mostly consisted of soybeans & wheat, and while it did have a positive affect on the intestinal microbiota at the initial stages of the feed trial, that apparently soon diminished over time. The longer it was fed, the lesser the positive affect. Also, while it was shown to elevate the expression of some immune related genes, it did not improve the disease resistance of koi challenged with Aeromonas hydrophila, which is one of the most problematic species of Aeromonas found in commercial aquaculture.

So what does that tell the average hobbyist that keeps ornamental species of fish?

Not a whole lot.

If you feed your fish a diet that is high in terrestrial based carbs such as gluten meal, corn, soybeans, wheat, potatoes, rice, etc - adding a probiotic such as Bacillus subtilis in large enough quantity could possibly increase the feed conversion ratio (depending on the species of fish), thereby causing an increase in growth, as well as a reduction in overall waste compared to feeding the same quality of feed, sans the probiotic. It could also help elevate the immune system of the fish, but so could numerous bioactive compounds found in natural raw ingredients such as, Antarctic Krill, Garlic, Spirulina, and micro algae such as Haematococcus pluvialis. Not to mention utilizing key vitamins & trace minerals at levels that far exceed the industry standards. As an example, instead of having a post extrusion level of 140 mg/kg of Vitamin C, having a level of 500+ mg/kg of Vitamin C. (with most of that coming from the raw ingredients themselves) Certainly some of these bacteria have been shown in some studies and using certain species of fish that they can improve the overall feed conversion ratio ....... but of foods that mostly consist of wheat & soybeans.

Of course that's a non issue for anyone that is NOT feeding large amounts of terrestrial based starch derived from corn, wheat, soybeans, potatos, etc to their fish.



Some of this is just plain old common sense, but some consumers can easily be sucked in by the hype.

Feed low cost crappy ingredients but add *special* bacteria to digest crappy ingredients, and charge twice the price of higher quality feeds that contain higher quality raw ingredients ....... simply because the former contain bacteria spores? Unfortunately many people buy into this type of hype or fad marketing.


Not picking on Hikari, the overall science behind all of this is still an unknown for the vast majority of tropical species of fish.
 
  • Like
Reactions: islandguy11
MonsterFishKeepers.com