T1KARMANN;4821516; said:you have proved my point the tank was to packed but i was tring to get a pair which you have shown in the 2nd pic
2 x 2ft asian aros in a 84x32 is fine
you are moving 2 silvers into a 96x36 whats the point silvers need 48 wide min as its just not right them having to bend to turn
thanks for showing the pics as it proves my point the other aros were going into a 1000 gal but i changed my mind and just kept a pair but that pair didnt work so im now down to 1 aro in a 8x6 but even if i had kept all the aros in the 1st pic they would have been fine in a 8x6
thanks for showing the pics as even with all the aros in yje tank my water was still 10 x better than yours![]()
Again your reading and comprehension skills are horrendous. I AM NOT MOVING THE SILVERS TO A 96 x 36. They already in a 96 x 36
as stated many times. The plan is to separate the two pairs Because I now feel the tank they are in is too crowded and will only become more crowded as they grow.Still following or do I need to type slower?
I already stated my plans for the next tank, this tank may or may not house any arowana. Now if ya can't recall my previous post you can easily scroll up and try to read again. I will take under advisement your opinion on the 4' width, but frankly IMO that width would be really small for an indoor pond.
Either way if your tanks are 10x better then mine. It is far from the spotless and crystal clear that you claim. This even seems to be the issue with your new tank
JK. But seriously I posted probably a few posts down from my OP that I'll probably get a silver. And by probably I mean absolutely if I do get a big enough tank to house one. And I would already have that tank and all necessary equipment before even thinking of purchasing my aro.
And yes, I've seen some pretty old silvers. I saw one last summer at the Ripley's Aquarium in Myrtle Beach, SC that was also easily over 3' and ridiculously deep-bodied, but it was certainly nowhere near 48".