first off, richard summarized the whole issue pretty well...blue pike are effectively gone. period, end of story (for the blue pike).
the rest of my response is in RED.
--solomon
the rest of my response is in RED.
MultispeciesTamer;2496929; said:The great lakes are massive bodys of water so its almost impossible for people to eliminate all of them, the only way they could disapear is if they hybridized with walleye.
no, this is not the only way they could disappear...disease, overfishing, habitat loss, recruitment failure...the list goes on...
People find species that were thought to be extint all the time. Animals that live in a massive area that get hunted out or in this case get fished out will move to other parts of the area.
true, and possible, but they will die out if the 'other parts of the area' do not contain appropriate habitat for the survival of the organism.
Yes food and climate can change the apperence of the fish but not drasticly.
this is not the case, look up phenotypic plasticity and all sort of other literature about genetics and the environment regarding fishes...fishes actually respond quite fast in terms of morphological changes due to phenotypic plasticity and evolution than other vertebrates.
I bet if you caught 10 walleye out of lake Erie and DNA tested all of them, some would have blue walleye DNA present.
maybe (but not likely with a sample of only 10 fish), but blue pike are merely a subspecies, so there are bound to be a lot of commonalities between the two...we're not talking about two different species here.
Ive also heard they stocked blue walleye long ago in different bodys of water in Canada, Wisconsin, Minnisota.
The blue walleye is just an adaption of a normal walleye where one dominant trait in certain fish survived and breed with others untill they populated the lakes. Probly started of as just a color morph that blended in more and was less likly to get seen by predators then a normal walleye.
not necessarily; blue pike were endemic to the Great Lakes region relatively close to post-glaciation. if anything they were wiped out and genetic lines on decline as well. they were a young subspecies overall.
Just like the great Lakes muskie compared to other strains of muskie it just hasnt adaped for a long enough time period to be a subspecies.
this is more the area of populations, not subspecies (which can be quite nebulous). just because you have two distinct populations of Esox americanus americanus (grass pickerel) doesn't mean they are going to end up as two separate subspecies.
--solomon
