Box of Americans from Don Conkels (with pics)

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
Status
Not open for further replies.
Thanks Mojarraman, good info there. I was reading with interest your experiece with rate of growth. Everything seems in line with what Don had told me on the phone, i wish I could remember it all. My expectation is that I will be ok for 1-2 years without major tank space needs. I did quite a bit of research prior to this purchase in atempt to pick fish that given the space may not kill each other. Don threw in several others that I don't know a lot about though. I expect as they mature I may want to sell or give away several I decide I am either less interested in or I just have to many of.

In the long term my desire is to build a big community tank likely > 2000 gallons. I am reading all the tank build threads here on this great site and taking it all in.

Here is my list of what I know I have and what I don't know but also have :) Comments welcome on who may be inevitable problems.

Bag 1 Nandopsis salvini - 6
Bag 1 Paratheraps hartwegi - 1 - DOA
Bag 1 Vieja bifasciatus - 5
Bag 1 Vieja maculacauda - 1 - arrived with Ich
Bag 1 Vieja synspilus - 1
Bag 1 Vieja zonatus - 1
Bag 1 TOTAL - 18 fish - 3 still unidentified

Bag 2 Astatheros altifrons - 2
Bag 2 Astatheros nourisatti - 3
Bag 2 Astatheros rhytisma - 1
Bag 2 Archocentrus nanoluteus - 5
Bag 2 Herichthys bocourti - 5 - 2 Died
Bag 2 TOTAL - 17 fish - 1 still unidentified

Bag 3 Amphilophus lyonsi - 1
Bag 3 Chuco godmanni - 1 - arrived with Ich
Bag 3 Herichthys carpintis - 3
Bag 3 Vieja argentea - 4
Bag 3 Vieja regani - 1
Bag 3 Vieja rainbow regani - 1
Bag 3 Labridens - ?
Bag 3 Nandopsis Bartoni - ?
Bag 3 TOTAL - 17 fish - 6 still unidentified

Bag 4 Herichthys pearsei - 3
 
Great. Seeing the numbers helps alot. Thanks for posting those.

A community tank of 2000 gallons dedicated to your CA's would be incomparable. I'd be lying if I said I have any idea of anybody doing something like that. If there is one anywhere, I'd like to see pics. Actually, I'd like to see it in person.

1) Your lyonsi will probably never show anything like breding dress by him/herself. Here's one of (my three) paired girls of wild Rio Colorado. A few of her babies are visible under her mouth/jaw:
DSC01250.jpg

And here's her boyfriend:
DSC01246.jpg

These are shot with a lousy 5 magapixel P&S which poses problems. I had to Photoshop the male slightly to try to capture the bright red on the operculum and bright yellow body color, but failed: the red doesn't show well and the brilliant yellow has shifted somewhat towards gold. Nonetheless, the colors in the dorsals - both sexes - are quite "true to life" just less iridescent than "in person." The fact is, the brightness of the yellow in breeding lyonsi is probably slightly exceeded only by labridens. I prefer the lyonsi over both those and festae, and when I get the photos right, it may become obvious why. Now here's my "show" male shot at the MCA EXPO 2009 with a 10 megapixel courtesy of Mike Wickham:
_DSC6806a.jpg

Obviously he isn't actually "showing" under poor lighting (for photography), over bare glass (IDIOTIC RULE #11) and without a mate. Still, the difference is extremely well "demonstrated" by the photo comparison - there really isn't any - none whatsoever (as anybody who has handled breeding lyonsi for any significant period will instantly understand). For now just take my word: generally speaking, keeping a lyonsi alone (or in a community alone) except for holding purposes is like having two left feet - they only get in the way.

2) The choice of salvini I don't quite understand. In a community tank, female salvini ONLY - the prettier of the sexes - would be better suited IMO. The males are lb/lb the meanest CA's (I think) like their cousins the "black nasty." Also, I probably wouldn't consider keeping male salvini w/ atlifrons or rhytisma of either sex. However, I honestly don't know because I never tried. I might also question keeping altifrons w/ rhytisma because of their close relations (hybridization/rivalry). I personally would not hybridize rare/endangered species - I would pure breed them - even F1's though all my brood stock currently consists of wilds That's just me. The only reason I'm opposed to hybridization (for myself) is that the "pure" or "natural" species are prettier. I could care less if others hybridize. To each his own. IMO those who feel otherwise do not fully appreciate CA cichlids. I mention for instance, nebuliferus and irregularis, my "favorite" CA's. But for now, I'll compare this head shot of one of my F0 bull male synspilus Rio Sartoon to flowerhorn any day:
webDSC00792aa.jpg

Remember, that's a measly 5 megapixels. Somebody please show me a better head shot? I'm curious if there is one. I'm keeping 2 bulls and 4 female syns-Sarstoon in a 210 gallon. Both males are about 14" and the girls flame orange (in addition to every other) coloration in courtship that "bars the door and then mops the floor":
webDSC00783aaacopy.jpg

(The big pale yellow area above the ice-blue on her belly is where she goes bright orange.)


That reminds me, one of my (2 male) guttulatus breeders, which I prefer to zonatus:
087.jpg


3) Your "rainbow regani" are probably mislabeled. The ones in Don's photos are wild Rio Nachatal regani, and likely what he shipped you. He may have told you they are "rainbow colored," which they are, in courtship, and pretty much the rest of the time. Superb choice for a 150+ gallon tank, same as the argentea.

4) Not that it matters, but Don has seen lymphocystus on upwards of seven different species at Mexican and Central American collection points. If nobody else has seen it on cichlids there, or at least not reported it, maybe that's because no one else collects anywhere near as many CA's for distribution, never has, and probably never will?? Something to consider.

5) Not that it matters, but did you get any lymph or hybrids? Of course not. Out of the millions of fish he's distributed, practically nobody has gotten any hybrids from Don's farm in 7-8 years except about 2 X-breeds that were advertised as such. Prior to that, the sp. "Hondo" was a fairly isolated instance and he wasn't fully at fault for that. Anybody that gets hybrids from DCT should mention it to Don himself and then promptly take a picture and get a full refund, instead of blathering around various chatrooms about it. In doing business with someone, most of us at least have the courage to say a) our name and b) the exact nature of our complaint and c) are ready to verify it, if for some crazy reason, first a supplier won't honor his obligation. Ever notice how some people hide behind screen names anonymously while badmouthing others that maintain legitimate careers and stake their reputations on their stock? Anybody with complaints about DCT fish should take it to the source instead of rushing out to add grist to the rumor mill. If not, that type of customer probably has some serious issues about his/her own priorities. My understanding is that Don has not had any (unresolved) complaints directly from his domestic or international customers in decades. None that were reported to him, anyhow. And he doesn't frequent fish forums...he's a wholesaler, so what good would it do?

6) I'm told Don is pleased to be of service and have you as his valued customer and would always like to know the results of any purchase. He would be happy to photo ID any DCT cichlid at any time for you, now, or at any time in the future...and answer any other questions you may have concerning fish from his farm. In case it escaped anyone's attention, DCT is extremely interested in satisfying each and every customer, hobbyists and distributors alike, to the extent to which it in within his power to do so - just like most every legitimate supplier that has any intention of staying in business. Those that don't soon go back to pumping gas, of course.

7) Needless to say, I'm glad you opted for real cichlids - a man after my own heart!
 
Wow, great pictures. The synspilus is just spectacular. I'm having a hard time finding mine. All the juvi pics I have found of them they look a lot like the Bifa and I got many that look like that. I hear you on the Salvini. I asked Don how to devide them between my 2 tanks and he said he would put the Salvini in my smaller 150 gallon tank. From your comment I guess I know why now.

I am glad you are setting things straight about DCT. I will tell you that Don really went out of his way to get me these fish. He may have some choice words about Northwest Airline and shipping to Maine if you ask him.
 
Mojarra, valid points you make. This is not the first thread where DCT has been dragged through the mud. I've never dealt with DCT personally but after speaking with those who have, watching his powerpoint presentations and reading what info is available on the web (rumors and thread posts not included, sorry) about DC, I think I can safely conclude that there are many rare/ hard to find species available in the hobby today solely because of DCT. The fact that he's the only importer, that I know of, who is heavily involved in research and conservation of native fish populations speaks volumes.
 
Power, IMO, you definitely deserve a flower.

I think it would be hard to state it any better than you have. There are others involved in research, but not at his level of importation as you say, and Don deserves some credit for that, past and present.

So yes, Don Conkel's involvement with the SUMA conservation effort (SUMA running in the 100's of 1,000,000$ is my understanding) says something. He is a former Board Member and active Consultant. Without him we wouldn't have anywhere near the abundance of Central Americans worldwide we do now, methinks. FWIW he's also currently distributing 10 species of rare South American (Uruguay) cichlids. Anyhow, most anybody seriously interested in lots and lots of exotic Central Americans probably owes a pretty big debt of gratitude (lip service at a bare minimum) wether he/she cares to recognize it or not. No biggie. But sometimes we as hobbyists need to state the plain and simple truth.

Mr. Bad, I think you've got things under control. IMO, probably no worries about ID'ing the synspilus right now for at least three reasons: a) that will come clear soon enough beings the bifas could/should take the black stripe the length of the body even at small sizes and syns not b) they will soon be easily distinguishable for other reasons c) the bifas females will generally breed smaller (roughly 6") and sooner than syns (roughly 7-8") even as much as a year - but at least six months - for guestimates.

Also, Bad, you've got to quit scolding your Oscar. They only respond to coddling. But seriously, I see that breeding may not be your primary intent, but breed they will. And X breed between altifrons and rhytisma and some of your Vieja seems within the realm. I would say that females tend to be somewhat opportunistic (and "monagamous but not for life" except possibly amongst Parachromis for instance). To early to even care, really. The NICE thing [challenge to yourself?] is to ID the fishes yourself over time and perhaps ask others to confirm your own suspicions. Then you'll become the expert and us the grasshoppers! I taught Don a thing or two, but not three. Not yet LoL! He taught me a thousand things so it was a decent trade-off?

Bad, how's the weather up in Maine? It's gradually getting colder here in Kansas (KC metro area) after a November mostly in the 50's-60's which was a wee bit warmer than normal.

All My Best To One And All,
Paul
 
thats a nice stocking.
just some info on don because i might order from him shortly.
Are all his fish wild caught? are the salvinis?
altifrons, how big do they get?
 
Mojarraman;3662218; said:
Power, IMO, you definitely deserve a flower.

I think it would be hard to state it any better than you have. There are others involved in research, but not at his level of importation as you say, and Don deserves some credit for that, past and present.

So yes, Don Conkel's involvement with the SUMA conservation effort (SUMA running in the 100's of 1,000,000$ is my understanding) says something. He is a former Board Member and active Consultant. Without him we wouldn't have anywhere near the abundance of Central Americans worldwide we do now, methinks. FWIW he's also currently distributing 10 species of rare South American (Uruguay) cichlids. Anyhow, most anybody seriously interested in lots and lots of exotic Central Americans probably owes a pretty big debt of gratitude (lip service at a bare minimum) wether he/she cares to recognize it or not. No biggie. But sometimes we as hobbyists need to state the plain and simple truth.

Mr. Bad, I think you've got things under control. IMO, probably no worries about ID'ing the synspilus right now for at least three reasons: a) that will come clear soon enough beings the bifas could/should take the black stripe the length of the body even at small sizes and syns not b) they will soon be easily distinguishable for other reasons c) the bifas females will generally breed smaller (roughly 6") and sooner than syns (roughly 7-8") even as much as a year - but at least six months - for guestimates.

Also, Bad, you've got to quit scolding your Oscar. They only respond to coddling. But seriously, I see that breeding may not be your primary intent, but breed they will. And X breed between altifrons and rhytisma and some of your Vieja seems within the realm. I would say that females tend to be somewhat opportunistic (and "monagamous but not for life" except possibly amongst Parachromis for instance). To early to even care, really. The NICE thing [challenge to yourself?] is to ID the fishes yourself over time and perhaps ask others to confirm your own suspicions. Then you'll become the expert and us the grasshoppers! I taught Don a thing or two, but not three. Not yet LoL! He taught me a thousand things so it was a decent trade-off?

Bad, how's the weather up in Maine? It's gradually getting colder here in Kansas (KC metro area) after a November mostly in the 50's-60's which was a wee bit warmer than normal.

All My Best To One And All,
Paul
CONCRETE INFO:headbang2
 
Mojarra, did you ask him for the specifics of how he treats Lymph when he sees it on recently collected fish? Did he mention why he thinks he's seeing it in the wild? Seems it has to be stress related due to pollution weakening their immune systems.
 
Lymphocistus Disease

Lymphocistus is a viral disease affecting the victims fins which resemble "cauliflower like nodules." In its advanced stages the fishes look grotesque. This disease can affect marine fishes and cichlids from the Americas, Africa and Madagascar. I have seen it in the African Tilapines but never in the Haplochromine varieties of the Great Lakes. Contrary to reports claiming this virus is incurable, lymphocistus can be controlled and eradicated over a good deal of time. In the commercial industry, I feel it best to destroy them unless you have an earthen pond to place them into. That alone eradicates the disease in 3-4 weeks time with little effort and little cost of time, money and energy. However, if it is an important or rare item you can’t live without there is an alternative. It is time consuming but well worth the results when your task is complete.
It is best to destroy or remove the most badly infected specimens from the main hospital tank. Look at it as an intensive care unit which requires daily attention. I find two medicines administered together in full dosages to be the most effective. Those are "Clout" and "Fungus Eliminator" by Jungle. For the first week daily water changes around 50% in volume each time are in order. That percentage of medicine is to be re-administered after each change. A noticeable reduction in the nodules should occur within that time. The water changes can be cut in half, once every other day. Continue to replace that percentage of medicine you siphon out. In about 3-4 weeks the fishes should show significant reduction in nodules with many specimens kicking the problem altogether. If necessary, split the tank's inhabitants into two tanks, good and bad. Stop medicating the good tank and keep up with frequent water changes and soon this unsightly problem should be gone. Continue medicating the "bad tank" until you deem it unnecessary. Calculating the amounts of water changes and medicine clearly shows that it’s best to use smaller but adequate tanks for efficiency and economy.
-Don Conkel

Here is one of my H. Carpintis breeders - a wild Luguna de Chairel:
DSC06045a.jpg


And one of my wild male P. louisellei, which I think I (personally) prefer to any population of freidrichstahlii I know of. Just a minor matter of my own tastes. The hole in the head (I think it's called?) since cleared up. Sorry 'bout the poor water/picture quality:
DSC05550a.jpg


DCT has both wilds & F1's. Somethingg get missed? Are we jacking Mr. Bad's thread? Hopefully not. He'll set it straight if so.

Best As Always,
Paul
 
Thanks for the reply (and yes, sorry Mr. Bad for the hijack!).

Since lymph is viral, I'd bet a lot of that cure is anecdotal evidence in nature. Viruses don't respond to antibiotics, and antifungals shouldn't affect it either. Perhaps they help in staving off secondary infections that are present along with the lymph (as a result of the fish being weakened by it).

It may be as simple as the stepped up water changes are just providing a better environment from which to recover from the lymph --- overall stress would be lessened too.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
MonsterFishKeepers.com