[/B]
Hello; Yes, a prediction based on previous forum threads about dog maulings. In a previous thread concerning a fatal child mauling some were quite vocal that the dog should live. In a thread over a year ago a forum member said they hoped a dog on my bicycling route did get me when I mentioned carrrying protection when I ride. I still expect this thread to contain posts that center about concern for the dog. Some folks just cannot stand the idea of a dog being put down.
By my count there have been at least two posters laying the responsibility off onto the dogs owner. One put 100% on the owner in all regards, legal and otherwise.
If I recall correctly, there was a coment to the effect that it is a shame the dog will have to pay because it has an irresponsible owner. I take that as defending the dog in that the dog would'nt have to be put down if the owner had done his/her duty. If the dog had been locked securely at it's home the incident could not have happened, but that does not change the fact the dog is vicious and acted on it's own.
My take is that there are many thousands, if not millions, of dogs running loose and not kept secure. The vast majority of those dogs do not bite/maul people regardless of having a good owner or an irresponsible owner. Those dogs that do choose to bite and/or maul do not do so based on the type of owner, but for their own reasons. I am on the side of having these vicious dogs put down,while others do not want the dogs killed and find a number of justifications. Irresponsible owners being perhaps the more common justification.