cosmos
- Thread starter Gill Blue
- Start date
Well, I can't state the means of proving my side without violating TOS more then I already have, as it a banned subject. So I'm only focusing on the other side since it's not banned. Even through I believed in Evolution(Macro)/Big bang for over 32 years, I've realized what hocus pocus it is now. In effect only mentioning one side makes my arguments incomplete.
But your side can't be proven ever, so how can you completely dismiss the BBT while embracing the opposite belief?
Sent from my SCH-R970 using MonsterAquariaNetwork App
Sent from my SCH-R970 using MonsterAquariaNetwork App
That is a little on the unfair side seeing as how his hands are "tied" with the TOS he will get banned before he can even fully make a point.
I'm just playing devil's advocate and pointing out that neither side can be 100% proven at this point so arguing that someone else is wrong while not proving their side when you can't prove your own is a bit hypocritical.
I guess my question to both sides of the debate is what will it take for you to be convinced. Because I have information that can support both sides of the argument. If you have tunnel vision or are unwilling to consider things then what's the point of discussion.
