Well if they were to cross breed, they would be labeled as just that, a "hyrbrid". Love the discussion guys 
sam buckle;3336028; said:what isnt responsible is the mass unkown pond breeding in thailand etc where parentage is unkown and rays are just sold with stupid names .
thats all.
sharp tooth;3334076; said:it may happen in the wild but why encorage it in the aquarium. do you really want to loose proper leo`s, henlei ect to end up with lots of cross bred rays which not only you dont know what they are but they will eventually all start looking the same.

Hystrix;3334260; said:If they occur in the same area then yes.
That does not give humans the right to encourage it.

csx4236;3334589; said:This thread is great
FishDog;3334923; said:I agree!
There are not enough people in this world that keep rays to sustain a clean gene pool like the wild can. If you have more than one type of ray in your tank which most people do, you can't stop them from getting frisky. You only have to draw the line when the hybrids are taken to the labs and test tubes. If a ray cross breeds in the fish tank, chances are it would do the same in the wild.

lincolngoh;3335963; said:All this talk against cross breeding sounds like nazi propaganda to me. There is no health argument against cross breeding as it actually produce tougher ray. Rays are going to be bred to suit the hobbyist taste for it's beauty. Nothing else. So cut the crap on preserving the species unless you intend to be the worlds first ray breeder to bring these pure breeds back to the amazon to release them.
With the quota, the less beautiful rays are not exported or thrown back. In a few generations the looks of the CB ray are going to improve through selective breeding till they look different/better from their wild cousins too.
Sellers mislabeling fishes is a human fault, not the rays. Hobbyist just have to trust ray sellers who have spend time and effort building up a reputation they value.
As for using mutts as an example, all 'pure breds' are wolf offshoots barely a few hundred years old.
People have been breeding offshoots of different fish for it's looks like goldfish from carp for hundreds of years... do you see the carp facing extinction? You see hobbyist complaining when a new breed of goldfish pops out?
...wait a minute, isn't the US president a mixed breed too...

lincolngoh;3335981; said:Hobbyist are second biggest threat to their survival next to deforestation so there is no point getting all high and might about protecting the rays. Like the arowana these fish will be safe from extinction long after the last wild one is gone because of their demand.
When we remove the ray from the wild, we have already forfeited the right to say we are preserving the species. The ray becomes a domestic pet and that is all there is to it.
Lastly, the fact that these ray can crossbreed already tell you that they are mutants hybreds from a common ancestor. We are only continuing what the random forces of nature began.
ShadowStryder;3336237; said:

My intrests are more focused on the health, behavior and symmetric patterns.DavidW;3336475; said:...
I am not in favor of " hybridization", but selective breeding within a species/variant is less problematic for me.
...
I guess it depends on your interest.
My interest was mostly in their biology, behaviour and place in the ecosystem. Hybrids can't inform much about those things. Patterns within a variety for me are a secondary interest.
I never had any interest in turning my wolves into lapdogs.
keepinfish;3336424; said:Why encourage it? Like i said it would be nice to see smaller rays in captivity where more people can afford to keep these awewome animals.
Leos will always be leos crossbreeding will never make us loose leos![]()
![]()
![]()