UTEP;4064035; said:
I mean do we actually think that Rapps or ** go into South America and fish these fish out-come on-they do the best they can.
Well knowin**... a lot of his fish are caught by him. (And the rest are all directly from credible sources like **, etc. And his F1's/F2's are from his own pairs or pairs that he sold to people and he buys back the fry.)
Now onto the main topic... And yes I realize there have been some great comments already, but here are my thoughts.
I have to say I for one usually mention where I get my fish, not in the title but I still do. If I am going to say I have a wild pair and am selling f1 fry there is no doubt that if I say my pair originated from **,**,** that people on this forum know I have done the best I can to guarantee I have a wild pair without collecting them myself.
That said while I used to tend towards buying domestic fish, there are often very good reasons to buy wilds. One quick example is wild discus and how nearly impossible it is to find any domestic discus that truly look wild.
In addition I have a pair of wild pearsei that have a much more green hue not seen in tank raised. Does this make a wild tagged with a seller name better?
No, but as said time and time before it does give you that a way to track the fishes origin as best as possible. Which is important when trying to stay true to a location... Heck how many times have fish been split into different species even when they live ~1 mile away from each other... (And yes a sellers name isn't going to tell you the location of a fish, but it at least gives more info then a fish bought in an auction with just the word wild on the bag.) (Though even then the seller usually will tell you the location if you ask.)
Maybe I am just too used to forgetting the location of the fish and having to go back and ask the seller the location. (In GA we have quite a few people that go out and collect their own fish.) So all in all, I am just trying to say that putting a sellers name next to the fish is just an easy way of conveying just a little bit more information.
And yes I would say that your example of creamsickle is a nice fish for a tank raise... And now I post this vid.
http://s15.photobucket.com/albums/a399/ikevi/?action=view¤t=MVI_0640.flv (The intentions of this vid was to show I kept the fry for some people.)
Now just looking one would say yes the midas are nice fish, but compared to the creamsickle aren't that special. But if I tell you they are f1/f2 from **. People switch their expectation to something that is more true to the wild and likely rate these fish better then initial impressions. (In other words if you are expecting a wild fish the creamsickle looks like fish bait)
And I have to say, a tank/farm raised creamsickle in my mind is much more of a "Designer" cichlid then any f1/f2 type fish sold out there. IE for those that want fish as close to wild as possible colormorphs = fish that fish farms intentionally raised to look different so that they could get more money for in essence selling the same fish. (Or the true "Designer" cichlid.)
Ok this has gotten way too long. (And I should say I have a ton of non-wild fish, I am just trying to explain why when I post fish I almost always mention where I got them from.)