A few new fanatics will certainly jump aboard the "anti Conkel agenda" through the various internet forums because of this, but it comes with the territory. I have been accused of hybridization for a few years after Ad Konings stated so in a St. Petersburg Times newspaper article. In fact he labeled me a "shameless self promoter" in regards to propagating and selling populations of cichlids from the Principle Canal de Ebano, the Rio Lamas and the Rio Chomba. I put these populations in my first book. Ad never conferred with me about them. These are cichlids that I collected in northern Mexico in the late 80's and early 90's. Their existence in nature is the consequence of the Rio Verde system being connected to the Rio Panuco system through a massive series of agricultural canals in the late 50's and early 60's by the Mexican government. They are basically hybrids of labridens populations with carpintis populations. I did not know so when I originally collected them as I am not an ichthyologist. Nor, did I know so when bred them or when I sold their first spawns. I bred them in outdoor Florida ponds in the spring and summer of 1992, and after a few months of growing out their young, discovered they were indeed not true species. They didn't all look alike. I didn't have to be an ichthyologist to determine that. I discontinued selling them and breeding them out of principle. The same thing has been going on with the Media Luna populations of yellow labridens for some year now. Their genetics are irreversibly altered and contaminated with carpintis. Only a few uncontaminated populations of them exist on a few cattle farms in their excavated "watering" ponds. However, even they are severely stressed, by unmonitored herbicide and pesticide runoff, not to mention the years of accumulated fecal material.