Correlation, no matter how reliable, never proves causation.please explain. What you're saying is indisputable evidence to support a theory does not make it a fact?
Correlation, no matter how reliable, never proves causation.please explain. What you're saying is indisputable evidence to support a theory does not make it a fact?
knifegill;4309195; said:Correlation, no matter how reliable, never proves causation.
Not related.how about an example. Don't say something silly like people once believed the earth was flat
Thirty years ago, aged water was a must. Every good fishkeeper had the yellowest, most saturated water imaginable because fish did best in it. It was observed, and proven, time and time again that fish kept in aged water were far more likely to live longer and even breed. That clean water was a sure killer of fish was not doubted. And it worked. The theory seemed to become fact as more and more people had success with this method. It was rather obvious that aged water = healthy fish.If you can test someone elses theory with the same variables and tolerances and get the same results the theory is sound. Without this proof than everything we know about is flawed. As a rule, if it can be tested time and again and the results are a constant than it is a scientifically proven fact. Remember you can't publish results unless you have eliminated all other variables.
I hate it when people talk like this, it just makes us all look like victims of our own minds (which we are NOT, imo) and really doesn't accomplish anything.The human mind is wired to find truth in anything. It's how we process the unknown Finding truth is just how we comfort our subconscious from our fear of the unknown. If I can find the case study on this phenomenon I will post it. It's in one of my psych books....