Lupin;1974907; said:A lot of sharks are saltwater fish. If you try to study regarding osmotic shock and osmoregulation, then you will see what really is wrong with this practice. SW and FW fish are very different. IMO, forcing them to adapt to conditions to the convenience of the aquarist is really cruel. SW and BW fish become more prone to fungal infections compared to FW and vice versa in certain cases. In both cases, certain species are unable to live for a long time. This is another reason why the practice is wrong.
Zoodiver;2014067; said:I'm still looking for the study done on the populations living in isolated freshwater lakes in South America (Ven). That's even more thought provoking to me.
Shiroi Katsune;2676815; said:In Florida there are large populations of Southern Stingray that are completely freshwater for life. They were said to be land locked when the St. John and other rivers of the sort receded from the sea. They are slightly smaller however they are the same species and reproduce as they have for hundreds of years. Also, don't Greenland Sharks go into freshwater. I saw some thing about them being in the St. Lawrence river on discovery. Coming across that would definatly make my wet suit brown!
cudamaster13;2676854; said:bull sharks are the only sharks with the ability to live in brackish water and fresh water as well as saltwater but they have been known to eat hippoes so anyone who would want to keep one would be![]()