Goldfish are Nutritious

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
Just a few questions during such a vehement debate.

One how do you guys feel about the packages that the fish food comes in? I personally am not a fan of having plastic touch my own food so I try to avoid that as much as possible and in turn do the same for my fish and store most things in glass or ceramic.

Two do you have any concerns about the sustainability/contents of commercially available food?

I often wonder about the sustainability of the resources going into the fish food as well as the potential for contamination via bioaccumulation/biomagnification. To be honest I feed a combination of live that I breed (mollies, gambusia, guppies), combined with worms, insects, and other inverts from the garden (organic), fresh vegetables/fruits for those species that require it, and pelleted food. I have tried both hikari and nls and I'm not completely sold on either one. However, I feel that it is important to offer these pelleted foods especially during winter when my ability to produce a wider variety of foods is limited.

I think you are on the right track personally. There are concerns about the shelf-life of commercial diets, but if it were dire then nutritional disease would be more prevalent than it is. Just buy small amounts in sealed containers and use it quickly. Using pellets as a supplement is fine if you can get your fish to take them. The ingenuity you show in finding local sources of fresh feed is inspired. i stock my koi filter at home with gambusia and it provides a goodly number of feeders for most of the year while also controlling mosquitos. This would be an excellent topic to explore further. Sustainable Aquaria.
 
RD, the only way you win this argument is if I let you. That is because you are on the wrong side of the facts. It fits though that someone with such a giant ego could believe they have discovered a superior diet than what fish eat naturally in the wild. Why is it that this year’s fad brand is always so much better than last year’s? Good quality commercial diets can provide adequate nutrition, but never excellent nutrition. But a pellet also can’t be hunted. It can’t be stalked. It can’t stimulate the natural instincts, which make our fish what they are. A lion in the wild is something to be feared. A lion in the zoo is just a shadow. You see RD, you are not arguing with me but with 100’s of millions of year’s of evolution. I just happen to be pointing that out. Until you come up with a pellet that swims all you got is cooked paste. Its expensive cooked paste, but still just paste.

I really think that you are on the wrong side of the facts.. your lion in wild vs zoo was a pathetic attempt at some kind of point. A killer whale in the wild is something to be feared, but at Sea World it's just a giant fish.. haha. They have killed several people in captivity over the last 5 years.. and I'm sure your lion analogy could be said the same for sharks as well?

I've read the discussions that RD has chimed in on, and I have even argued with him about some things, but they were just opinions... however, he's throwing valid proof of statments, links, and numbers at you, and you are still saying he's in the wrong.. you're a funny guy.

I use multiple different brands of PELLETS, and many people on here do, and their fish are stunning, healthy, and some have even lived longer than their stated life expectancy. Yet, pellets are the devil.

I think you should just stop with this topic all together. You did not start this thread to talk about how fish do better on a natural diet.. you made this thread to try to bribe people into thinking "Goldfish are nutritious." How do I know this? Because if you didn't, then your title would have been "natural diet is better than pellets".

Maybe if you picked up a book, searched on the internet a bit, and learned some up to date things, your koi farm wouldn't be on the back burner... we can all speculate, but I'm going on a hunch that we won't be seeing SJKoi as a business much longer.

You need to realize that things change, and while you may have grown up knowing this and that, chances are it's been obsolete for quite some time.

I think it's also funny that you say you stock your koi tanks with gambusia etc.. but then in previous posts you admit to buying truck loads of commercial koi food. So, pellets are bad, yet you use them. Talk about being a hypocrite much?
 
This was never about winning Rich, at least not for me. It was about ensuring that members of this forum got both sides of the story, and in turn they can make their own informed decision.

I'm not sure what you mean by "fad", the food that I feed my fish has been around for over 20 yrs, and is used by some of the most prestigious public aquariums in the USA. This is a company that has no sales reps, no marketing reps, and outside of the odd trade show spends zero $ on advertising. A small USA based family owned operation that by word of mouth alone has now spread to almost every country in the free world. That hardly equates to being a fad.

BTW - In those 100’s of millions of year’s of evolution, did these same fish evolve to be kept in glass boxes, and to swim in dechlorinated tap water? Or is that somehow different?
 
Tell you what Rich, you seem keen on experiments, so here's one for you. Take that container at your LFS with the dusty lid that you just mentioned to a certified lab and have it analysed for vitamin c content. They should even be able to break the vitamin c content down showing how much comes from the polyphosphate supplement, and the raw ingredients themselves. Then post back here showing that lab report & those numbers. I suspect that your next argument would be that there is too much vitamins in the food!

Rd, I think another good experiment would be to see how much of the water soluble Vitamins C, Thiamine, Riboflavin, Niacin, Pantothenic Acid, B6, Folate and B12 leach out of a pellet of your brand of feed after soaking in water for 5, 10 and 15 minutes. I have never been able to get any of my feed salesmen to give me an answer to that question. Your label states to feed only what will be consumed immediately. I am not quoting here. I wonder why that is? This is in addition to the nutrient loss that occurs from the moment of manufacture. Yeah, you pump the vitamin levels way up in top tier feeds because you have to if you are going to get them to suitable levels at the time of consumption. Unfortunately, most pellets aren't top tier. You do get what you pay for. When you promote pellets as superior to live feed, that is a generic statement. Its just not true. Its not true with top tier diets and its especially not true with the staple diets.
 
Rd, I think another good experiment would be to see how much of the water soluble Vitamins C, Thiamine, Riboflavin, Niacin, Pantothenic Acid, B6, Folate and B12 leach out of a pellet of your brand of feed after soaking in water for 5, 10 and 15 minutes. I have never been able to get any of my feed salesmen to give me an answer to that question. Your label states to feed only what will be consumed immediately. I am not quoting here. I wonder why that is?

It says feed immediately because just like fish waste, ANY food can foul the water. Why the heck would you let food sit in your tank for 10-15 minutes?
 
RD, the only way you win this argument is if I let you. That is because you are on the wrong side of the facts. It fits though that someone with such a giant ego could believe they have discovered a superior diet than what fish eat naturally in the wild. Why is it that this year’s fad brand is always so much better than last year’s? Good quality commercial diets can provide adequate nutrition, but never excellent nutrition. But a pellet also can’t be hunted. It can’t be stalked. It can’t stimulate the natural instincts, which make our fish what they are. A lion in the wild is something to be feared. A lion in the zoo is just a shadow. You see RD, you are not arguing with me but with 100’s of millions of year’s of evolution. I just happen to be pointing that out. Until you come up with a pellet that swims all you got is cooked paste. Its expensive cooked paste, but still just paste.

interesting, but fish in the wild aren't eating goldfish every day either.....

and we are not talking about fish in the wild at all really when it comes to the hobby of fish keeping. No matter how large the tank we keep our fish in, its still an artificial environment. A lot of the fish we keep don't come from the wild.....alot of tank raised species.

Most wild fish are pretty opportunistic and will eat whatever they can to get by. A lot of predators only eat a real meal once or twice a week and the rest they fill in with whatever they can find. It's a far cry from what our fish in glass boxes experience with a controlled daily diet regardless of what composes that diet.

Most of our fish, in our house, are pets. They all have names and my main concern as a fish keeper is to provide a diet that keeps our pets healthy. Same as we do our dogs. Most fish that I've kept that were the healthiest generally also looked the best and had significant growth. That was on an exclusive pellet diet......I've already run 2 different 3 month one brand exclusives and am getting ready to do a third. My fish really don't need to prey on smaller fish to be healthy........Im pretty sure my petsmart jd was born in a tank, as were his parents and their parents before them.

it's also interesting if you factor in the fact that a lot of the species we keep actually attain larger size and live longer in tanks than they do in the wild. No predators, more regulated diet........alot of things to put in to the equation but some species thrive in aquariums.
 
Rich, I was going to post a detailed response to your question, then stopped myself as I really don't see the point in going 'round & 'round in circles with you over tihngs that have already been covered in detail. In the end you just won't get it, and seem to be blind to the fact that modern commercial foods have been created to cover every scenario that a layperson such as yourslf can come up with. If you are hell bent on proving something, then get busy proving it already. The health & longevity of my fish are all the proof that I need.

As far as vitamin content in pellet feed, I think that a better question here would be, how many fish owned by members of this forum, and are fed pellet foods, are showing signs of Vitamin C, Thiamine, Riboflavin, Niacin, Pantothenic Acid, B6, Folate and/or B12 deficiencies? :duh:
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com