Heaviest Jaguar Cichlid

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
Fishbase measures a lot of fish in standard length, not total length. So the fish are measured from the mouth to the base of the caudal peduncle, not to the end of the tail. Check for the SL or the TL after the length.
 
For comparison, this is a 3.5lb bass caught on Oahu, where I used to live.

(Not me!)
8Q2Yr-eb13007baf49c084198512f2ccf3f640.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deadliestviper7
Jason_S;3967903; said:
Midas cichlid max length=24.4 cm or 9.6"

http://fishbase.org/Summary/speciesSummary.php?ID=4786&genusname=Amphilophus&speciesname=citrinellus

Amphilophus chancho max length=24.2 cm or 9.5"

http://fishbase.org/Summary/speciesSummary.php?ID=63710&genusname=Amphilophus&speciesname=chancho

Amphilophus amarillo max length=15.5 cm = 6.1 in

http://fishbase.org/Summary/speciesSummary.php?ID=61773&genusname=Amphilophus&speciesname=amarillo

Amphilophus xiloaensis max length = 16 cm = 6.3 in

http://fishbase.org/Summary/speciesSummary.php?ID=61775&genusname=Amphilophus&speciesname=xiloaensis

Maybe it's just red devil types...

exCichlasoma festae (sic) max length 25 cm = 9.8 in

http://fishbase.org/Summary/speciesSummary.php?ID=12308&genusname=Cichlasoma&speciesname=festae

well I could go on but now fishbase is having issues...too many connections or something lol. Anyway, point being...when it comes to the max length/size field on fishbase...take it with a tablespoon of salt. ;)

I think that is inaccurate my Amarillo is 10 inches and Ive seen 16 inch Chanchos.
 
UTEP;3970598; said:
I think that is inaccurate my Amarillo is 10 inches and Ive seen 16 inch Chanchos.


Yeah very inaccurate....that was my point :P lol
 
LowCel;3970880; said:
I would say that is pretty darn accurate, I mean that is about how tall mine is. :D

daddyb.jpg

aIMG_0761.jpg


lol..I know, right. xiloaensis only grow to 6"??? riiiight...my 2 males are getting close to being that tall as well...I need to get some more recent pics of them.

Awesome looking male you have there. :)
 
EVAN YUNCK;3963907; said:
12" PROB. AROUND 1.5 LBS. PEOPLE WAY OVER ESTAMATE THE WEIGHT OF FISH

X2 and the length. Where are all these 20" jags? I have never seen one anywhere near that big. There is quite a bit of difference in a monster 14" jag and a 20" fish.
 
unknownuza13;3971218; said:
X2 and the length. Where are all these 20" jags? I have never seen one anywhere near that big. There is quite a bit of difference in a monster 14" jag and a 20" fish.


In the wild probably, anything over 16" in aquaria is a quite uncommon.
 
Jason_S;3970802; said:
Yeah very inaccurate....that was my point :P lol

Thanks, I thought that fishbase would have more accurate figures. The entries for some of those species are probably dated.
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com