How Do You Guys Feel About Animal Experimentation

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
SumoNinja said:
I don't think it'll be a problem forcing experiments on them

if catching, restraining and jailing them wasn't possible then they'd be walking free

i'm sure they'd get sedated and then strapped to a bed or experimented on in an induced coma

for feedback, well, for example, if they wanted to test a new eye shadow out on an inmate, after application if the eyeballs fell out that's all the feedback they need. they wouldn't need the inmate to lie about how it brings out the blue in their eyes and highlights their face over all
Click to expand...

Roflmao@eye fell out.


Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
 
skjl47 said:
Hello; We seem to have drifted away from the "moral" / "ethical " aspect of the thread. May we accept that effective testing protocols can be had using either non-human animals or human animal subjects? More to the point that either can yield fairly similar results if done properly.

There are several particular individual humans that I personally would not mind to see in a test lab. Not so much people in general. A problem with such an approach is that I myself may be on someone else's list.

There are also acceptable categories of crimes committed that perhaps deserve he worst punishment possible. A down side has already been mentioned. That being the possible innocence of someone convicted of such a crime. I believe the state of Virginia executed a man who was later proven to have been innocent of the particular crime. Several people have been released from death row after evidence like DNA has cleared them. I just do not see a way around that.

To live in a style that most of us have embraced as "normal" involves cruelty to animals. To have many of the useful and common day to day products around, we have already subjected animals to horrible conditions. The same can besaid about food production practices and keeping fish in aquariums.

Were I about to go blind (fill in your most feared disease), it likely would not matter how many or under what conditions lab animals had to suffer. I can work up sympathy for their plight but I really, really do not want to be blind. I can hope that the least harmful effective techniques will be used and the fewest number of test subjects used.
Click to expand...

Well thought out post. one of my key components of my personal suggestion on using prisoners is not going back 20+ years ago but sticking to people who have been convicted with the technology of modern forensic. I think we'd all agree that you're less likely to be sentenced to death without pretty solid proof today.

It's with modern technology that we're learning that people were wrongly convicted in the first place.


Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
 
FMA4ME said:
No. Do you ever watch those commercials for new drugs? Doesn't it ever trip you out how many have a possible side effect of thoughts of suicide?? How am I supposed to figure out if the monkey killed itself due to the drug, or just didn't appreciate being caged?
Click to expand...
Got to love this post.
 
FMA4ME said:
It was kinda a joke, it's in super poor taste thinking about it now. I apologize.

Yeah I think monkeys can learn to sign.
Click to expand...

I don't think monkeys can sign

ballinouttacntrol said:
Roflmao! OMG omg.....so they're getting primates and teaching them sign language and then killing them?


Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
Click to expand...

how else is Bobo the chimp gonna tell you the pill you gave him made his headache (that you gave him to test this new pill) go away but now he can't see out of his left eye and his tongue is numb?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
MonsterFishKeepers.com
Top Bottom