X24;943697; said:well then, i got a sorce wrong or you got a sample wrong, but thats one lake i've heard has them.
keeping a fish and it being suited for captivity are two different things. i can keep an alligator gar alive in a big tub of water, but it wouldn't be suited for captivity there. an olympic swimming pool would probably be the only way to go to keep an alligator gar in captivity with it being "suited for captivity"
but you can't get a big enough tank to hold a whale shark, and you can't deny that. which if one thing proves a statement wrong, the statement is wrong.
This is not a difficult concept is it?
Sorry I did not sample wrong...I do this for a living..I know my gars and I do not mistake Alligators for longnosed..That lake has Longnosed and longnosed only.I was there looking for Spotteds just recently and found none despite historical records. News flash I actually work with these things and get paid for it in Michigan....Not a newbie dude I know my stuff and know it well...There is very little of this state I have not sampled or looked into...
There are no Alligators established in Michigan. Two have popped up as obvious releases and that is it. In both cases the fish where obvious pet dumps and no where near Muskegon lake. they where on my side of the state and I saw them both and Identified them..
For the rest I repeat:
No species of fish is 'Not suited' for captivity, there are just some people that should not keep them.
Do your research and only keep what you can keep..
Why this simple statement makes no sense to you is really amusing....