Jaguar + Green Terror ?

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
wow this thread almost became a flame fest got to say that the sevs and the firemouths go great together and the GT just deppends on it own personality
 
jarbunny;1811494; said:
my only concern is aggression. I don't want any of my fish getting harassed and what not.

Then i wouldn't be mixing Sevy's With a GT.

weedamese;1811740; said:
Lol as i stated 95% of the people here will disagree with me.

Seems more likle a 100% thus far.

weedamese;1811789; said:
He's 13" got him from a LFS with a quarter size hole in his head (HITH). I've been curing him for the past months and have gotten the hole down to 1/3 of dime size :) he came from being a ugly duckling that nobody wanted to a beautiful swan :ROFL:

What are the dimensions of the tank? It appears very small for that fish.
 
^^ wow i have 6 Jags. before you say **** this jag was at my LFS for over 1 year and nobody wanted it. It was missing the whole face pretty much but the eyes. The HITH holes were deep the owner wasn't taking good care of it and didn't want it anymore because medication was too expensive. Even in that 30g hospital tank i provide way better care than his previous owner. Anyways he's healing i do water changes everyday i have bigger tanks he will go into after he's cured but i'm planning to give it away after he's fully cured because my goal was only to heal him...:ROFL: lol
 
weedamese;1812865; said:
...Even in that 30g hospital tank i provide way better care than his previous owner...

So even if you don't provide adequate conditions yourself, as long as they weren't as bad as previously then it's okay? By that token, it would be fine to send abused and neglected animals to rescue shelters where they are only beaten and starved every other day, rather than all the time. After all, it'd be an improvement, right?
 
chillidragon;1813577; said:
So even if you don't provide adequate conditions yourself, as long as they weren't as bad as previously then it's okay? By that token, it would be fine to send abused and neglected animals to rescue shelters where they are only beaten and starved every other day, rather than all the time. After all, it'd be an improvement, right?

I do not know rescue shelters beat and starve there animals where did you get this information from? but anyhow I certainly don't starve or beat my fish. I said "even in the 30 i provide better care" I'm just saying he is way better off rite now than before. I'm not keeping him in the 30 for life. lets be real
If you read what i wrote i'm healing him and he is getting alot better. :D what do you guys want me to do hospital him in a 120G? :ROFL::ROFL::ROFL:
 
weedamese;1813771; said:
I do not know rescue shelters beat and starve there animals where did you get this information from? but anyhow I certainly don't starve or beat my fish.
If you read what i wrote i'm healing him and he is getting alot better. :D what do you guys want me to do hospital him in a 120G? :ROFL::ROFL::ROFL:

You missed the whole point of that post. What they were trying to say is that using you logic, it's okay to keep a fish in crappy conditions as long as they're not as crappy as the conditions that they were originally in.

I think Kim Jong Il uses that same logic...
 
^^ i dont keep my fishes in crappy condition to begin with I don't know how they came up with that. but yes i get the point.
 
You're entitled to your own opinion.

I believe the Korean dictator says the same thing about his citizens...
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com