ive seen these arguements in loads of puffer threads, puffer punk has got called out on her 'facts' before.
heres the thread
http://www.monsterfishkeepers.com/forums/showthread.php?402217-The-Hypocrite-thread-mbu
Their are some really valid arguements in the above thread as to why a Mbu does not need a 1000g tank.
this guru she keeps spouting on about was shown to have kept puffers in tanks which were too small.
heres the specific piece about 1000 gallons
'Robert T Ricketts wrote that article after a failed attempt at trying to keep a mbu long term in a
180 gallon tank. After his
single experience with attempting to keep his mbu in a 180 gallon tank, he made a post about what he personally felt the fish truly required (1,000 gallons) which has then been repeated over & over & over again ad nauseum.
Stuart Morse later echoes the same sentiments in his article on Mbu, after his failed attempt at raising his Mbu in a
100 gallon tank. (400 litres to be precise)
And Pufferpunk, while you may not have originally come up with that number, you have probably repeated it more times than anyone else. '
Pufferpunk i know your only trying to help but you have to acknowledge that actual experiance in keeping a fish has to be worth more than your assumptions.
what makes it worse is that your conviction that this guy is all knowing on the subject of puffers has created a whole section of people who constantly give peope abuse about their tank size without the benefit of any actual experiance.
surely Andrex with 20 yrs plus experiance in keeping Mbu shouldnt have to fend off criticism from a Mbu newbie on some moral crusade fueled by what is effectively guesswork by someone who has never kept them.
that is all, rant over lol