elevatethis;785369; said:I would put money on that boa being bitten by a rat that was much too big for it to constrict safely. Keeper error, not snake error.
Ball pythons have been labeled as "picky" eaters because keepers keep them in sub-optimal conditions and do silly unnecessary things like remove them from the safety of their enclosures to be fed.
edit: I haven't been offended in any way so far by any posts or disagreements with my opinion on this (I've heard them all before countless times)...I'm not handing out any insults and expect the same in return, I think that this has been a good discussion so far and hope we can continue in a mature way.
Well, I have to admit I am offended by your opinion, because you just said yourself that what I'm doing is silly.
I still haven't heard your counter-argument for my experience. If you had read my posts throroughly, you would already know that:
a.) I do NOT feed live prey items too large for the snake(s). Maybe you and I differ on what is "too large." As mentioned before, I try to keep the prey smaller than the thickest part of the snake. For a BP, nothing larger than a small rat.
b.) also, I mentioned twice already that, according to what I've witnessed, bites didn't occur from reluctant snakes (and I'm specifically including ball pythons, mind you...which were fed outside their cage); it was because the pythons struck at wrong angles.
So, I'm not feeding prey that's too large and these are ball pythons that have very strong feeding responses. What, pray tell, am I doing wrong? Is there some magical spell that renders the gnawing of rodents useless if they're offered inside the snakes' cage?