never saw 20/20 thing you speaking of and take medias word for crap. the debate can go on for ever, i only ask that you look up the numbers.
they owned dogs, not sure where violent crime plays into it. either way, my opinion.
I am under the opinion that the 2 can not be separated in this breed.
again, there is a dark and unpredictable side to these dogs.
Hello; that you make such a statement tells me that you are aware of how dangerous the breed is.Any responsible APBT owner wouldn't allow unsupervised interaction with a unfamiliar dog.
Hello; I never saw that particular tv show. I do have knowledge of a couple of PB incidents and pay attention to the reported maulings. In one of these PB threads a few years ago I posted links to sites with statstics about fatal maulings (Including the CDC) In one particular study over a few years the PB type was responsible for over 50% of all the fatal maulings.APBT is limited to a 20/20 special they saw or some other media headline.
the owner and how much violent crime have they been involved in, if any?
That is how it was in the early days of pit bull fighting but nowadays it seems that some people like them to be as vicious as possible.....not that I'm saying this was the case with this owner.Pitbulls were bred to fight other dogs, not to attack humans; in fact in dog fighting rings there were/are humans in the ring any aggression towards humans isn't tolerated and those dogs would of been culled