if anyone can provide a scientific article that states pitbulls where initial bred for the purpose of fighting other pitbulls i would love to read it.
most "bully breeds" were "made"(i guess) to serve as some kind of protection. im pretty sure that mastiffs where bred as war dogs. but we dont see mastiffs in the news nearly as often (or ever).
i will agree that its mainly related to the owners. but i also think that its a numbers game. i'm not going to waste my time looking up what dogs are mostly owned in the US because those numbers are based off of dog registrations. but if i were to do an independent study in my area, pitbulls would likely be the most common dog. i make this assumption off what ive seen at the petstore i worked at and the dog parks i go to. and frow what ive seen, like someone alreaady said, most of these owners are total clowns that just want a tough dog. i think if it were some other large breed took the place of the pitbull then that breed would be the problem and not the pitbull anymore.
most "bully breeds" were "made"(i guess) to serve as some kind of protection. im pretty sure that mastiffs where bred as war dogs. but we dont see mastiffs in the news nearly as often (or ever).
i will agree that its mainly related to the owners. but i also think that its a numbers game. i'm not going to waste my time looking up what dogs are mostly owned in the US because those numbers are based off of dog registrations. but if i were to do an independent study in my area, pitbulls would likely be the most common dog. i make this assumption off what ive seen at the petstore i worked at and the dog parks i go to. and frow what ive seen, like someone alreaady said, most of these owners are total clowns that just want a tough dog. i think if it were some other large breed took the place of the pitbull then that breed would be the problem and not the pitbull anymore.