Wow, who pissed in your cornflakes this morning?
Of course it was just an opinion, obviously I nor anyone else on MFK will know exactly how each & every man made mutant fish in Asia is created, Ryan was right on the money in that regards. But that doesn't equate to one not being able to use decades of personal experience, knowledge, and some common sense as a foundation to form an opinion, which is exactly what I did.
IMO this becomes akin to a preponderance of the evidence, where a legal standard is met if the proposition is more likely to be true than not true. Where the standard is legally satisfied if there is greater than 50 percent chance that the proposition is true, also described as more probable than not. I believe this is what is used in your court of law in the USA, for matters far more serious than whether a fish is pure, or not.
For myself, that's more than good enough when eye balling the most recent fad cichlid created in secrecy behind closed doors in Asia. If you personally require more than that, I feel for you, but that's not my problem.
