The only time I could see putting a fish down as a viable option is if you absolutely cannot find someone that is capable of providing it with a good home or if death is inevitable and the fish is suffering. For example, if the only people willing to take the fish (either for free or for your full asking price) only have a 10G tank, then I think putting the fish down would be better than giving it to someone who will ultimately give it a slower, more drawn out death.
Profit should not be a factor what-so-ever. It's sad that so many people treat their pets as commodities. If you are upset that you paid X dollars for it and no one is willing to pay what you did, it's not that people are unwilling to pay fair price, it's probably more likely that you just overpaid. The fact that you would put the fish down for that reason is wrong.
But even if you are looking at this like an investment, which it looks like you are, you're being completly irrational. Have you ever bought stock? If you paid $50/share and the price drops to $25 at a time where you absolutely had to get out, would you take the $25 for it, or would you burn the stock certificate?
Profit should not be a factor what-so-ever. It's sad that so many people treat their pets as commodities. If you are upset that you paid X dollars for it and no one is willing to pay what you did, it's not that people are unwilling to pay fair price, it's probably more likely that you just overpaid. The fact that you would put the fish down for that reason is wrong.
But even if you are looking at this like an investment, which it looks like you are, you're being completly irrational. Have you ever bought stock? If you paid $50/share and the price drops to $25 at a time where you absolutely had to get out, would you take the $25 for it, or would you burn the stock certificate?
