Thanks Rob, Nikki, and Homer.
Bowlo, no need to get nasty. Take a deep breath and try to absorb what I am saying.
The term low grade, in reference to a FH does not necessarily equate to ugly. You may have chosen to take it that way, and get insulted, but I never once used the term ugly, nor was I implying that. Both fish appear to be healthy, and nice looking fish. But as an example, your male in these parts would sell for $5-10, where a high quality male can cost several hundred, or more, with even entry level quality fish starting at $150.
All FH are graded by breeders before they leave their tanks and go to retail vendors. There is a massive difference between a low grade trimac looking specimen, and a AAA+ masterpiece. Even at incredibly small sizes an experienced breeder can spot the rock stars, and there are numerous things a 2" FH can be graded for, besides just the flower line, and/or nuchal hump. Determining whether either sex is fertile can't be concluded at such a small size either, but the overall grading most certainly can be. The term low grade is just that, a grading, which is common every day terminology in the FH world.
You arrived here asking what any reasonably experienced FH keeper would consider entry level questions, so in kind you were treated as such.
No need to get all bent out of shape. I have been breeding fish for a lot of years, and clearly my standards and principles, and yours, are worlds apart. Good luck.