Should the Ebola infected Americans be allowed in US?

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
Status
Not open for further replies.
ecoli73 said:
This report is from researchers in Canada, published way before the current outbreak. Seems like you are the one who refuse to look at anything outside of your perception.


Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
Click to expand...
he certainly IS NOT the ONLY one.... but common sense is kinda rare on this particular thread ....if you start with the "anything is possible"angle you can talk youself( and others) into believing all sorts of complete BS
 
ballinouttacntrol said:
Hasn't the monkey story already been discussed 2 pages ago by heather? Why are we pretending it's not real? There was already a lengthy discussion on it. Even if its a different story it sounds like practically the same thing


Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
Click to expand...

The conclusion I think was that it is not airborne like the flu but certainly can be spread through air.


Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
 
Its bait click. call it internet news trolls that just want you to click to get hits. i am sure they can direct where i can talk to my dead mother, and the queen is actually a man. :ROFL:
 
lp85253 said:
going from a given (the guy is here and no dead folks lining the street )ya might want to start with the assumption that the people who do these things for a living might just be smart enough not to have chanced people getting anywhere near the infected doctor.. do you really think that you could get within 500 yrds of him during transfer?...that's CALLED security..that doesn't always include a bunch of BARNEY FIFE TYPES.. maybe that's what you were looking for?...btw... I , NOW THAT MY SUPPOSITION has been proven right (he's in containment, no dead people) , don't really need to provide "proof, the "proof" is in the outcome....the other side of the arguement .."it's toooooo dangerous "...kinda lost some steam...don'tcha think?
Click to expand...

Once again, you are speculating. "going from a given", you are assuming that they are there, but you don't know. So you are speaking about facts that you cannot prove. This is exactly what you are claiming other are doing. We've yet to find out if they have successfully contained any risk until there is adequate time for person to develop symptoms. The incubation period can be anywhere from 2 to 21 days. We're not there just yet, so don't assume we are in the clear just yet.

I've lost no steam as you have yet to still produce any proof that what you say is factual. You are giving your best guess at what happened. You giving us your opinion on what you expect to be reasonable security measures could sonly provide a false sense of security that could have potentially not been there. You claim to desire fact but provide none of your own.

The only thing I'm fishing for here is for you to admit you know nothing more than anyone else. You are simply providing your opinion of what you think happened and presenting it as factual information. Just admit that you are arguing for the sake of arguing.
 
pops said:
oxymoron statement.
Click to expand...

It already been stated that it is not an airborne sickness, but can be transmitted through the air via bodily emissions, i.e. coughing, sneezing, etc. I'm not sure why we are four pages into this thread and we are still discussing this.
 
Pharaoh said:
Once again, you are speculating. "going from a given", you are assuming that they are there, but you don't know. So you are speaking about facts that you cannot prove. This is exactly what you are claiming other are doing. We've yet to find out if they have successfully contained any risk until there is adequate time for person to develop symptoms. The incubation period can be anywhere from 2 to 21 days. We're not there just yet, so don't assume we are in the clear just yet.

I've lost no steam as you have yet to still produce any proof that what you say is factual. You are giving your best guess at what happened. You giving us your opinion on what you expect to be reasonable security measures could sonly provide a false sense of security that could have potentially not been there. You claim to desire fact but provide none of your own.

The only thing I'm fishing for here is for you to admit you know nothing more than anyone else. You are simply providing your opinion of what you think happened and presenting it as factual information. Just admit that you are arguing for the sake of arguing.
Click to expand...

I , YOU ARE CORRECT....know LESS than MOST ABOUT THIS .. ..I do know however HISTORICLY(DECADES) the CDC has NEVER caused a major outbreak of any kind....I shall just stand by THEIR RECORD...that has been my position in this entire mess ...I DON'T know any "inside"secrets..just the history of events that didn't happen(CDC screw ups)...I just get tired of seeing people talk sheer hysteria for sport (EBOLA's gonna get us!!!!...keep the borders closed to the infected!!!!!)
 
having teenagers and the such (they never wrong, just ask them) I should be ignoring the goof stuff.

:)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
MonsterFishKeepers.com
Top Bottom