rayman;2536752; said:Same study as word document:
http://www-heb.pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/congress/2004/Elasmo/4Charvet-AlmeidaReprod.doc
rayman;2535833; said:And this is the reason why the ban was lifted and there are qoutas for some species. A summary of the studies on reproduction of freshwater stingrays:
http://journal.nafo.int/35/charvet-almeida/22-charvet-almeida.html
sp. C there is the cf. histrix from Rio Negro.
Since then there was a study on leopoldi and an extensive study on orbignyi in the Parana-Tocantins area.
rayman;2537947; said:The cf. histrix are studied since 1996 and the catch for the aquarium trade had no impact on the population. There is some tag and release work going on to get better understanding of growing rate and migratory behavior. Too bad that these rays have no scientific name. Because of this the complete study can not released.
It is a very bad thing if the subject of your study has no scientific name. You can not publish about the biology of a Potamotrygon sp. C. At first the species has to get her name. And this is very slow in potamotrygon raysThe species could be named since 10 years, but nothing happened.
vamptrev;2581529; said:sounds like they are gonna try to keep the ban lifted from know on![]()